Xiaomi consistently delivers excellent value in the budget smartphone market. The Redmi Note 11 and Poco M4 Pro 5G are two compelling options, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down their key features to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
Both phones share the same Dimensity 810 chipset, but the Poco M4 Pro 5G offers 5G connectivity and a slightly better display. The Redmi Note 11 boasts a marginally faster charging speed. Ultimately, the Poco M4 Pro 5G is the better all-rounder for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2021, November 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, November 11 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 62 min | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Milky Way Blue, Mint Green | Poco Yellow, Power Black, Cool Blue |
| Models | 21091116AC | 21091116AG, MZB0BGVIN |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.07 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1553:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 296721 (v8), 353663 (v9)
GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
- Slightly faster charging
- Potentially more refined software (region dependent)
- Good value for money
- No 5G connectivity
- Slightly dimmer display compared to Poco M4 Pro 5G
- Camera details are unclear
Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity
- Brighter display (510 nits)
- Exceptional battery life (123h endurance)
- Potentially better camera system
- Slightly slower charging than Redmi Note 11
- Design may be less appealing to some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays with impressive contrast ratios (1553:1). The Poco M4 Pro 5G edges out the Redmi Note 11 with a slightly higher measured brightness of 510 nits, resulting in better outdoor visibility. While both offer a smooth experience, the Poco's display feels a touch more premium.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a key area where differences emerge. While both offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities (specific details are lacking in the provided specs), the Poco M4 Pro 5G is generally expected to have a slightly more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. Real-world testing would be needed for a definitive comparison.
Performance
Powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset and CPU configuration, performance is virtually identical between the two devices. Expect smooth everyday usage, capable gaming at medium settings, and efficient multitasking. Neither phone will break any speed records, but they handle daily tasks admirably.
Battery Life
The Poco M4 Pro 5G shines in the battery department, boasting an endurance rating of 123 hours – a testament to its exceptional power efficiency. While the Redmi Note 11 charges slightly faster (62 minutes vs. 59 minutes), the Poco's longer battery life provides more peace of mind.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is ideal for users prioritizing slightly faster charging and a potentially more refined software experience (depending on region). The Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G is a better choice for those who need 5G connectivity, appreciate a vibrant display, and want a phone with excellent battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 810 chipset good for gaming?
The Dimensity 810 is capable of handling most games at medium settings. Don't expect high frame rates on demanding titles, but it's suitable for casual gaming.
❓ Which phone has better 5G support?
The Poco M4 Pro 5G is the only phone in this comparison with 5G connectivity.
