Realme GT Neo 3T vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China): Performance and Charging Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Realme GT Neo 3T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Redmi Note 11’s Dimensity 810 and 33W charging. However, the Redmi Note 11 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China) | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 62 min | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Milky Way Blue, Mint Green | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | 21091116AC | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Good battery endurance
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful processor for gaming
- Limited camera details
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 870
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Redmi Note 11, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the GT Neo 3T’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor use. The Redmi Note 11’s display specifications are less detailed, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and panel technology difficult, but it likely targets a similar visual experience for everyday content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T, positioned as a performance-focused device, likely incorporates a more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 870, potentially resulting in better image quality and faster processing. The Redmi Note 11’s camera system is likely optimized for general-purpose photography, while the GT Neo 3T may offer more advanced features and better low-light performance. The absence of detail regarding OIS on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo 3T’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) represents a substantial leap in performance over the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11’s MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6nm). The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, delivers significantly faster processing speeds for gaming and demanding applications. The Dimensity 810, while capable, is geared towards efficient power consumption rather than peak performance. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The GT Neo 3T is the clear choice for users who prioritize a smooth and responsive experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging can fully charge the battery in a remarkably short time, while the Redmi Note 11 takes 62 minutes with its 33W charging. This difference is significant for users who value convenience and quick top-ups. While the battery capacity isn't specified for either device, the GT Neo 3T’s faster charging effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and value affordability above all else. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and the convenience of incredibly fast charging, even if it means spending a bit more.