The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China variant) and Oppo K10x represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim for affordability, they take different approaches to performance and features. The Redmi Note 11 prioritizes a balanced experience with a Dimensity 810 chipset, while the K10x leans into rapid charging with a Snapdragon 695 and 67W SuperVOOC technology. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more efficient chipset, the Oppo K10x emerges as the winner. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a good balance of performance and power efficiency. However, users heavily invested in the Xiaomi ecosystem or seeking a slightly more powerful CPU core configuration might prefer the Redmi Note 11.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 62 min | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Milky Way Blue, Mint Green | Blue, Black |
| Models | 21091116AC | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 210 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 810
- MIUI software offers extensive customization options
- Strong brand recognition within the Xiaomi ecosystem
- Slower 33W charging compared to the K10x
- Dimensity 810 may run hotter under sustained load
- MIUI can be perceived as bloated by some users
Oppo K10x
- Incredibly fast 67W SuperVOOC charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem for reliable connectivity
- CPU performance slightly lower than the Redmi Note 11
- ColorOS may not appeal to all users
- Oppo’s software update policy can be less consistent than Xiaomi’s
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, a common choice in this price bracket. While specific details like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are unavailable, the focus here is on functionality rather than visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be similar, and both will likely offer a standard 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rate. The absence of LTPO technology means neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power saving.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary camera around the 50MP mark, accompanied by standard ultra-wide and macro lenses. The Oppo K10x may benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which is known for its strong image processing capabilities, particularly in low-light conditions. The Redmi Note 11’s camera performance will rely heavily on Xiaomi’s software algorithms. Given the market segment, expect similar image quality overall, with the K10x potentially offering slightly more refined results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a CPU configuration of 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration prioritizes peak CPU performance, potentially offering a slight edge in single-core tasks. Conversely, the Oppo K10x’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) employs 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores. While the peak clock speed is lower, Qualcomm’s Kryo cores are generally more efficient, leading to better sustained performance and thermal management. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized 5G modem. Both devices likely feature similar RAM configurations, but the K10x’s chipset is expected to handle multitasking and gaming with slightly better efficiency.
Battery Life
This is where the K10x truly shines. While battery capacity is not specified, the 67W wired charging capability is a game-changer. Oppo claims an 80% charge in just 33 minutes, significantly reducing downtime. The Redmi Note 11’s 33W charging, while respectable, takes 62 minutes for a full charge. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to potentially longer battery life during typical usage, offsetting any potential capacity difference.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China) if you need a phone with a slightly more powerful CPU for demanding tasks and prefer the MIUI software experience. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prioritize incredibly fast charging, value a more power-efficient chipset for extended battery life during moderate use, and appreciate Oppo’s ColorOS interface.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense combat scenarios. The K10x’s thermal management will be crucial for sustained performance, and the more efficient chipset will help mitigate throttling compared to the Dimensity 810.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Oppo K10x compared to the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 11 in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The K10x can reach 80% charge in approximately 33 minutes, while the Redmi Note 11 requires over an hour for a full charge. This means you can quickly top up the K10x during a short break, whereas the Redmi Note 11 requires a more significant charging period.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 (China) support Google Play Services, or am I limited to the Chinese app ecosystem?
The China variant of the Redmi Note 11 typically ships without Google Play Services pre-installed. You may need to sideload them, which can be a complex process and may not be fully supported. This is a significant consideration for users reliant on Google apps.
❓ Which phone is better for long-term software support and updates?
Xiaomi generally offers a more consistent software update policy than Oppo, providing more frequent security patches and OS upgrades. However, both brands have improved in recent years, and the actual update experience can vary depending on the specific model and region.
