The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Honor X9d and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China variant) represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they take different approaches to achieving it – the Redmi Note 11 relying on the established Dimensity 810, while the Honor X9d debuts with the newer, more efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially longer software support, the Honor X9d emerges as the winner. Its 66W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Redmi Note 11’s 33W. While the Dimensity 810 offers a slight CPU performance edge, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s efficiency and faster charging make it the more practical choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 28 | 2025, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2025, October 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 76.1 x 7.8 mm (6.37 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) | 1200 x 2640 pixels (~427 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.79 inches, 112.1 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, HDR, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 810 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 15, Magic OS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, compass, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 62 min | 66W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 8300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mysterious Black, Milky Way Blue, Mint Green | Reddish Brown, Midnight Black, Sunrise Gold, Forest Green |
| Models | 21091116AC | MTN-NX1 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China)
- Potentially higher CPU performance for demanding tasks.
- Established Dimensity 810 chipset with known performance characteristics.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Less efficient 6nm process node.
- Potentially shorter software support lifecycle.
Honor X9d
- Significantly faster 66W charging.
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 chipset.
- Reverse wired charging capability.
- Potentially longer software support.
- Slightly lower peak CPU performance compared to the Dimensity 810.
- May be slightly more expensive.
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The Honor X9d, being a newer release, *may* benefit from slightly improved color accuracy and viewing angles. The absence of information regarding refresh rates or PWM dimming makes it difficult to assess potential eye strain concerns.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. It’s reasonable to assume the Honor X9d, being newer, benefits from improved image processing capabilities. The absence of information regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We can expect both phones to include standard features like portrait mode and HDR, but the quality of these features will vary.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 11’s Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6nm) features a CPU configuration of 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This offers strong multi-core performance, particularly for its price bracket. However, the Honor X9d’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 (4nm) utilizes a more modern architecture with 1x2.3 GHz Cortex-A720s, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A720s, and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A520s cores. The 4nm process node is crucial; it translates to significantly improved power efficiency, meaning less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance during prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. While the Dimensity 810 might win in raw clock speed, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s architecture and process node give it an edge in real-world usability and thermal management.
Battery Life
The Honor X9d’s 66W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Redmi Note 11’s 33W charging. The X9d can reach 100% charge in a significantly shorter timeframe (estimated 62 minutes for the Redmi Note 11 vs. potentially under 45 minutes for the X9d). The X9d also offers 7.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Redmi Note 11. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4’s superior efficiency means the X9d is likely to deliver comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery cell.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (China) if you prioritize raw CPU performance for tasks like video editing or demanding multitasking, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Honor X9d if you value battery life, significantly faster charging, and a more modern chipset architecture that promises better long-term efficiency and potentially more software updates.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 in the Honor X9d struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
While not a flagship-level chipset, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 4nm process node helps prevent overheating and throttling during extended gaming sessions, providing a smoother experience than the Dimensity 810 might offer under sustained load.
❓ How much faster is the 66W charging on the Honor X9d compared to the Redmi Note 11’s 33W charging in real-world use?
The 66W charging on the Honor X9d can realistically shave off around 20-30 minutes of charging time compared to the Redmi Note 11’s 33W charging. This means you can go from near-empty to a usable charge much faster, minimizing downtime and maximizing convenience.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 (China) support 5G connectivity?
Yes, the Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset supports 5G connectivity, allowing the Redmi Note 11 (China) to connect to 5G networks where available. The Honor X9d's 5G capabilities are also confirmed via the Snapdragon 6 Gen 4.
