Xiaomi consistently delivers compelling value in the budget and mid-range segments. The Redmi Note 11 4G and Poco X4 Pro 5G represent two distinct approaches to affordability. The Note 11 4G focuses on established reliability, while the X4 Pro 5G pushes the envelope with faster charging and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the best fit.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a performance edge and future-proofs with 5G. The significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer, offsetting the similar battery endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 01 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
9W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Gray, Pebble White, Sea Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | 21121119SC | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
- Proven and reliable MediaTek Helio G88 chipset.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Reverse wired charging capability.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Less efficient 12nm chipset.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G chipset.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging.
- Future-proof 5G connectivity.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- No reverse wired charging.
- Relies on digital image stabilization.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting similar IPS LCD panel characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. The focus here isn't on display quality, but rather on the overall user experience. Bezels are likely comparable given their similar price points. Without further data, it's difficult to declare a clear winner; both will likely offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both rely on primary sensors around the 50MP mark. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will be primarily digital, potentially resulting in softer images in low light. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro cameras is questionable, offering limited practical benefit. Without more data, a definitive camera comparison is impossible.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Redmi Note 11 4G’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm). The 6nm process inherently provides better power efficiency, translating to less heat and potentially more sustained performance. The Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Helio G88’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. While both have octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon’s architecture is more modern and efficient.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life under typical usage. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 4G’s 18W charging is relatively slow, taking considerably longer to fully charge. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a game-changer, achieving 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. This rapid charging significantly reduces downtime and enhances the overall user experience, effectively mitigating any potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G if you prioritize a proven, reliable chipset and don't require 5G connectivity. It's ideal for users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a more future-proof device with faster performance, 5G capabilities, and dramatically quicker charging – making it perfect for media consumption and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a smooth experience. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a noticeable improvement over the Helio G88 in the Redmi Note 11 4G, especially in sustained performance due to its more efficient 6nm process.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Redmi Note 11 4G?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. It can reach 70% charge in approximately 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Redmi Note 11 4G’s 18W charging will take well over two hours to fully charge, making the Poco X4 Pro 5G a much more convenient option for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G's 5G connectivity actually make a difference in real-world usage?
The benefit of 5G depends on your location and carrier. If you live in an area with good 5G coverage, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds. However, if 5G is unavailable, the phone will fall back to 4G, and the difference will be negligible. It's a future-proofing feature that adds value, even if you don't immediately benefit from it.
