The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. The A33 5G brings 5G connectivity and a more modern chipset, while the Redmi Note 11 4G focuses on delivering a solid experience at an even more accessible price point. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is the superior choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset offers significantly better performance, and the 5G connectivity provides future-proofing. While the Redmi Note 11 4G is more affordable, the performance gap is substantial enough to justify the price difference for all but the most budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA 800 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 25 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 01 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 75.5 x 8.9 mm (6.38 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) | 159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mm (6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/4.0”, 1.12µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
9W reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Carbon Gray, Pebble White, Sea Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | 21121119SC | SM-A336E, SM-A336B, SM-A336B/DS, SM-A336B/DSN, SM-A336E/DS, SM-A336M, SM-A3360 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | £ 174.99 / € 187.50 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.35 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 1.59 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 354420 (v8), 394918 (v9)
GeekBench: 1900 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G
- Faster and more efficient Exynos 1280 chipset
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Brighter and potentially more accurate display
- Generally more expensive than the Redmi Note 11 4G
- May not offer significantly better camera performance in all scenarios without detailed sensor specs
Samsung Galaxy A33 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (104h endurance)
- 9W reverse wired charging
- Significantly slower Helio G88 chipset
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Display specifications are less impressive
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 728 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi Note 11 4G. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on Samsung's typical A-series implementation), the A33 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Redmi Note 11 4G’s display specifications are less detailed, leaving questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered. The A33 5G’s display is a clear advantage for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for both. However, the A33 5G’s Exynos 1280 ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced, offering better image processing and noise reduction. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The Redmi Note 11 4G likely relies on software processing to compensate for potentially less capable hardware. The A33 5G’s superior processing power gives it an edge in computational photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G is powered by the Exynos 1280 (5nm), featuring a more modern CPU architecture with 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the Redmi Note 11 4G’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm) with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning sustained performance will be higher, especially during gaming. The A78 cores in the A33 5G also provide a significant architectural advantage over the A75 cores in the Redmi Note 11 4G. This translates to faster app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G supports 25W wired charging, significantly faster than the Redmi Note 11 4G’s 18W charging. This means the A33 5G can replenish its battery much quicker, reducing downtime. The Redmi Note 11 4G also offers 9W reverse wired charging, a niche feature for topping up accessories, but the faster charging speed of the A33 5G is a more broadly beneficial advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 4G if you prioritize absolute affordability and don't require 5G connectivity or demanding gaming performance. It's a good option for basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G if you value faster performance, 5G capabilities, and a brighter display, even if it means spending a bit more. It's better suited for users who enjoy mobile gaming, streaming video, and taking photos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A33 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Exynos 1280, built on a 5nm process, is generally efficient and manages heat well. While some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming, it's unlikely to cause significant performance drops or discomfort. The larger surface area of the A33 5G also aids in heat dissipation compared to the Redmi Note 11 4G.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range offer limited detail and image quality. They are often included as a marketing feature rather than a genuinely useful camera. Expect soft images and limited dynamic range. The primary camera on either phone will likely produce better results even when digitally zoomed in.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Exynos 1280 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at 60fps with medium to high graphics settings. However, sustained performance may vary depending on the duration of the gaming session and ambient temperature. Expect some frame rate fluctuations, but overall a smoother experience than the Redmi Note 11 4G.
❓ How much faster is the 5G connectivity on the Galaxy A33 5G compared to 4G on the Redmi Note 11 4G in real-world scenarios?
5G speeds can be significantly faster than 4G, potentially offering download speeds several times higher. However, real-world 5G performance depends heavily on network coverage and congestion. In areas with strong 5G signals, you'll experience faster downloads, smoother streaming, and lower latency. In areas with limited 5G coverage, the difference may be less noticeable.
