Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 vs Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers a substantially faster and smoother experience, particularly in demanding tasks and gaming. While the Redmi Note 10 offers respectable battery life, the A52s 5G’s performance advantage justifies the slight price premium.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 16 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant (market/region dependent) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM678 Snapdragon 678 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 74 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shadow Black (Onyx Gray), Frost White (Pebble White), Aqua Green (Lake Green) | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | M2101K7AI, M2101K7AG | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | € 159.99 | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 218788 (v8) GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1) GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
- Faster 33W charging
- Slightly longer endurance rating (though minimal)
- Potentially lower price point
- Significantly weaker processor
- Less bright display
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much faster Snapdragon 778G processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Likely superior camera image quality
- Slower 25W charging
- Slightly shorter endurance rating
- Generally higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 800 nits compared to the Redmi Note 10’s 682 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical AMOLED characteristics. However, the brightness difference is a key differentiator for users who frequently consume content outdoors. While both are AMOLED, the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness provides a more enjoyable viewing experience in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer a 'Photo / Video' camera experience, but details beyond that are lacking. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Samsung’s generally stronger image processing algorithms and the A52s 5G’s more powerful ISP (integrated into the Snapdragon 778G), it’s likely to produce more detailed and dynamic images, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 10’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the A52s 5G offers a higher potential for image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 10 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 678, built on an 11nm process, while the A52s 5G features the Snapdragon 778G, fabricated on a more efficient 6nm node. This process node difference, coupled with the 778G’s superior architecture – a Cortex-A78 prime core versus the 678’s Kryo 460 Gold – results in a substantial performance gap. The A52s 5G’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) is demonstrably more powerful than the Redmi Note 10’s (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver), leading to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience. Gamers will particularly benefit from the A52s 5G’s more capable GPU.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve similar endurance ratings – 110 hours for the Redmi Note 10 and 113 hours for the A52s 5G. This suggests comparable real-world battery life despite the A52s 5G’s more powerful processor. The Redmi Note 10 charges at 33W, reaching 50% in 25 minutes and 100% in 74 minutes, while the A52s 5G charges at 25W. While the Redmi Note 10 charges slightly faster, the A52s 5G’s efficiency gains from the 6nm process likely mitigate the impact of the slower charging speed on daily usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 if you prioritize maximizing battery endurance and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to trade a small amount of battery life for a significantly improved user experience.