Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 vs Oppo Reno 5G: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and value, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 is the better choice. However, the Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 delivers a substantial performance uplift, making it ideal for demanding users and gamers willing to sacrifice some battery longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 16 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant (market/region dependent) | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM678 Snapdragon 678 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 74 min | 20W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shadow Black (Onyx Gray), Frost White (Pebble White), Aqua Green (Lake Green) | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | M2101K7AI, M2101K7AG | CPH1921 |
| Price | € 159.99 | About 880 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 110h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -26.2 LUFS (Good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 218788 (v8) GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1) GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
- Exceptional battery life (110h endurance)
- Fast 33W charging
- Bright 682 nit display
- Less powerful Snapdragon 678 chipset
- Potentially limited gaming performance
Oppo Reno 5G
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 855 performance
- Smoother multitasking and gaming
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 20W charging
- Likely shorter battery life
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 10 boasts a display capable of reaching 682 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Reno 5G’s display specifications aren’t provided, Oppo typically focuses on color accuracy in this range. The Redmi Note 10’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard IPS panel, likely lacking the dynamic range of OLED displays found in some competitors. The lack of refresh rate information for the Reno 5G means it may not offer the smoother scrolling experience that is becoming increasingly common.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Given the Reno 5G’s positioning, it likely features a more sophisticated camera system with potentially larger sensors and more advanced image processing. The Redmi Note 10’s camera performance will likely be adequate for everyday use, but may struggle in low-light conditions compared to a device with a flagship chipset and optimized image signal processor. Without sensor size or aperture information, a definitive camera comparison is impossible.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a flagship-level processor from 2019, offering a significant performance advantage over the Redmi Note 10’s Snapdragon 678 (11nm). The 855 features a Kryo 485 architecture with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the 678’s 2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. However, the 7nm process of the 855 offers better power efficiency than the 11nm process of the 678, but the higher clock speeds and core count of the 855 will likely result in more heat generation under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 shines with an endurance rating of 110 hours, indicating exceptional battery life. Its 33W wired charging allows for a 50% charge in 25 minutes and a full charge in 74 minutes. The Reno 5G, with only 20W wired charging, will take considerably longer to fully charge. While the Reno 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the more powerful Snapdragon 855 will likely consume more power, potentially offsetting any capacity advantage. The Redmi Note 10’s faster charging and longer endurance make it the clear winner for users prioritizing battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 if you need exceptional battery life, a bright display for outdoor use, and a reliable daily driver without breaking the bank. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize smooth performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are comfortable with potentially shorter battery life and slower charging speeds.