The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 and Motorola Moto G100S represent different approaches to the budget and mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 10, a well-established model, prioritizes endurance and a proven track record. The Moto G100S, featuring a newer Snapdragon 6s Gen 4, aims to deliver a performance boost with improved efficiency. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a bright display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 remains a strong contender. However, the Motorola Moto G100S’s newer 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, making it the better choice for users who frequently multitask or play demanding mobile games.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 16 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 160.5 x 74.5 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 178.8 g (6.31 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant (market/region dependent) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 450 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM678 Snapdragon 678 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 612 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 25 min, 100% in 74 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Shadow Black (Onyx Gray), Frost White (Pebble White), Aqua Green (Lake Green) | Black, Blue |
| Models | M2101K7AI, M2101K7AG | - |
| Price | € 159.99 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 110h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.2 LUFS (Good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 218788 (v8)
GeekBench: 2860 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7.9fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10
- Exceptional 110-hour battery life
- Bright 682 nit display for outdoor visibility
- Faster 33W charging compared to Moto G100S
- Older Snapdragon 678 chipset
- Potentially slower performance in demanding tasks
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Improved CPU performance with Cortex-A78 cores
- Potentially smoother multitasking and gaming
- Likely shorter battery life than Redmi Note 10
- Slower 30W charging
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 10 boasts a measured peak brightness of 682 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Moto G100S’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it doesn’t surpass this figure given its focus on internal components. The Redmi Note 10’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a typical IPS panel, offering good color reproduction. Without further details on the Moto G100S’s panel type, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or viewing angles, but the Redmi Note 10 holds a clear advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the Redmi Note 10’s market positioning, it likely features a more versatile camera system with potentially higher megapixel counts. The Moto G100S’s focus appears to be on processing power, potentially impacting image processing speed but not necessarily image quality. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable results in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance will likely favor the device with the larger sensor and wider aperture (information unavailable).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 10 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 (11nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a Kryo 460 configuration. The Moto G100S, however, is powered by the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm). This process node shrink is crucial; the 4nm architecture delivers significantly improved power efficiency and transistor density compared to the 11nm process used in the Snapdragon 678. The Moto G100S’s CPU, with its Cortex-A78 cores, also offers a performance advantage over the Kryo 460 Gold cores in the Redmi Note 10, particularly in single-core tasks. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 shines with an impressive endurance rating of 110 hours, indicating excellent battery optimization. While the Moto G100S’s battery capacity is unknown, its Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process should contribute to improved power efficiency. However, the Redmi Note 10’s 33W wired charging (50% in 25 min, 100% in 74 min) is slightly faster than the Moto G100S’s 30W charging. The Redmi Note 10’s combination of high endurance and relatively fast charging gives it a clear edge in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 if you need exceptional battery life (110h endurance) and a comfortably bright display for outdoor use. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and reliability over raw processing power. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you prefer a more responsive user experience and improved performance for gaming and demanding applications, and are willing to trade some battery endurance for that extra speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G100S handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 represents a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 678. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should be capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. However, extended gaming sessions may result in some thermal throttling.
❓ How much faster is the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 compared to the 11nm process of the Snapdragon 678?
The 4nm process allows for a much higher transistor density and improved power efficiency compared to 11nm. This translates to better performance at lower power consumption, resulting in less heat generation and potentially longer battery life. The efficiency gains are substantial, though the exact percentage improvement depends on the specific workload.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 10's camera system significantly better than the Moto G100S's, given the lack of detailed specs for the latter?
Without specific camera specs for the Moto G100S, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the Redmi Note 10's established market position suggests it likely features a more refined camera system with potentially higher megapixel counts and more versatile features. The Moto G100S may prioritize image processing speed, but image quality could be comparable or slightly lower.
