The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The Redmi Note 10 Pro focuses on maximizing value, while the A52s 5G prioritizes processing power and 5G connectivity. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and future-proofing, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 732G, justifying the slight price premium. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.5 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Onyx Gray, Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | M2101K6G, M2101K6R | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | $ 107.43 / £ 163.94 / € 144.87 | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | $ 189.99 | - |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | $ 209.99 | - |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | $ 221.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 348.00 | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
|
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.7 LUFS (Very good)
|
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 295442 (v8)
GeekBench: 1780 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
- Faster 33W charging
- Slightly longer battery life (Endurance rating)
- More affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- No 5G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Slower 25W charging
- Slightly shorter battery life (Endurance rating)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching 800 nits compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 725 nits. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for AMOLED panels, but the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness provides a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. While both are excellent, the A52s 5G’s display is demonstrably superior for outdoor use and HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details matter. While both are listed as 'Photo / Video' capable, the A52s 5G likely benefits from the more advanced ISP within the Snapdragon 778G. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the A52s 5G’s image processing is expected to be more refined. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s camera performance will be solid, but the A52s 5G has the potential for better dynamic range and low-light performance. It's important to note that the prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices offers limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Galaxy A52s 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 10 Pro uses the Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core and more efficient 6nm process deliver a substantial performance advantage in CPU and GPU-intensive tasks. The A52s 5G will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. The 8nm process of the 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro is still capable, but it will show its limitations when pushed hard. The A52s 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro edges out the Galaxy A52s 5G in endurance with a rating of 118 hours versus 113 hours. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W charging, while slower than the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 33W (59% in 30 minutes), still provides a reasonable charging speed. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s faster charging partially offsets its slightly smaller battery capacity, but the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset contributes to comparable real-world battery life despite the difference in endurance ratings.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro if you need exceptional battery endurance and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and if 5G connectivity is a priority.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A52s 5G experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its excellent thermal efficiency thanks to its 6nm process. While some throttling is inevitable during prolonged, demanding gaming, the A52s 5G is generally well-equipped to maintain stable performance for extended periods, significantly better than the 8nm Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro a significant advantage over the 25W charging on the Galaxy A52s 5G?
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 33W charging is faster, reaching 59% in 30 minutes. While the A52s 5G’s 25W charging is slower, the difference isn’t massive. Both phones will fully charge overnight, and the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset partially offsets the slower charging speed in terms of overall usability.
❓ How does the 5G connectivity of the Galaxy A52s 5G impact real-world performance compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro?
The Galaxy A52s 5G’s 5G connectivity provides significantly faster download and upload speeds when connected to a 5G network. This is particularly beneficial for streaming high-resolution video, online gaming, and downloading large files. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is limited to 4G LTE, which is slower and may experience congestion in crowded areas.
