The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Motorola Moto G100S represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 10 Pro, a well-established player, focuses on delivering a comprehensive feature set at an aggressive price point. The Moto G100S, on the other hand, aims for efficiency with a newer, 4nm chipset, but at a potentially higher cost. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall value and a proven track record, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro emerges as the winner. Its brighter display, coupled with a competitive Snapdragon 732G chipset and a wider range of available storage/RAM configurations at lower price points, makes it a compelling choice. The Moto G100S's 4nm efficiency is promising, but lacks the Redmi's established ecosystem and affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2025, November 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 24 | Available. Released 2025, November 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco leather) back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 76.5 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 in) | 166.2 x 76.5 x 8.6 mm (6.54 x 3.01 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~392 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.0 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1050 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6435-AA Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | Virtual proximity sensing | - |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 7000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Onyx Gray, Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze | Black, Blue |
| Models | M2101K6G, M2101K6R | - |
| Price | $ 107.43 / £ 163.94 / € 144.87 | About 120 EUR |
| SAR | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) | - |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 6GB RAM | $ 189.99 | - |
| 128GB 8GB RAM | $ 209.99 | - |
| 64GB 6GB RAM | $ 221.00 | - |
| RENEWED | £ 348.00 | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 118h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-25.7 LUFS (Very good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 295442 (v8)
GeekBench: 1780 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 33W charging
- Proven Snapdragon 732G performance
- 8nm process is less efficient than 4nm
- Potential for more throttling under sustained load
Motorola Moto G100S
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Modern chipset architecture
- Slower 30W charging
- Limited performance data available
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 10 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 725 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a common pain point for smartphone users. While the Moto G100S’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer, potentially impacting usability in direct sunlight. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s ‘Infinite’ (nominal) contrast ratio suggests a typical IPS panel, offering good color reproduction, but lacking the per-pixel control of OLED displays. The absence of refresh rate information for the Moto G100S makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 120Hz option (not specified in the data, but a common feature) would provide a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s market positioning suggests a more robust camera system, potentially including a higher-resolution main sensor. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a definitive comparison is impossible. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi Note 10 Pro benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) optimizations within the Snapdragon 732G, potentially leading to better image quality in various lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Redmi Note 10 Pro is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 10 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with a 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver configuration. This is a proven performer in the mid-range segment. The Moto G100S employs the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 (4nm), built on a more efficient node. The 4nm process *should* translate to better power efficiency and potentially lower sustained temperatures, reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. However, the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s Cortex-A78 cores, while faster than the A55 cores, are fewer in number (4 vs 6 Kryo 470 Gold cores) and clocked slightly higher, suggesting a focus on burst performance rather than sustained multi-core workloads. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s wider range of RAM options (6GB/8GB) provides flexibility for multitasking.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro achieves an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, indicating excellent battery life. Its 33W wired charging allows for a 59% charge in just 30 minutes, providing a quick top-up when needed. The Moto G100S offers 30W wired charging, which is slower than the Redmi Note 10 Pro. While the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4’s 4nm process *should* improve power efficiency, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s established endurance rating suggests it already delivers exceptional battery performance. The lack of battery capacity information for the Moto G100S makes a direct comparison challenging, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s charging speed and endurance give it an edge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro if you need a bright, vibrant display for outdoor use, a well-rounded camera system, and the best possible value for your money. It's ideal for users who consume a lot of media and want a reliable, feature-rich phone without breaking the bank. Buy the Motorola Moto G100S if you prioritize long-term efficiency and potentially better thermal management, and are willing to pay a premium for a newer chipset architecture, though detailed performance data is currently limited.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 in the Moto G100S offer a noticeable gaming performance improvement over the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro?
While the Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 benefits from a more efficient 4nm process, the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro has a more mature driver support and a slightly more powerful CPU configuration. Real-world gaming performance will depend on the specific game and optimization, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro is likely to offer a comparable, if not slightly better, experience in many titles.
❓ How does the Redmi Note 10 Pro's battery life hold up with heavy usage, such as prolonged video streaming or gaming?
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s endurance rating of 118 hours suggests excellent battery life even with demanding tasks. While the 8nm Snapdragon 732G isn’t the most efficient chipset, the phone’s battery capacity and software optimizations contribute to its impressive longevity. Expect several hours of continuous video playback or gaming on a single charge.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on the Redmi Note 10 Pro worth considering for everyday photography?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras offer limited image quality and are often more of a marketing feature than a practical tool. The small sensor size and fixed focus result in images that lack detail and sharpness. While it can be fun to experiment with, don't expect professional-level macro photography from this camera.
