The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Note 10 Pro Max prioritizes a well-rounded experience, while the Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Poco X3 Pro is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a significant performance boost over the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 732G, making it ideal for demanding games and applications. While battery life is comparable, the X3 Pro charges slightly faster.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 60% in 30 min, 100% in 75 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Night, Glacial Blue, Vintage Bronze | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | M2101K6I | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Balanced overall experience
- Slightly more refined software (potentially)
- Significantly weaker chipset performance
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior Snapdragon 860 performance
- Faster charging speed
- Better suited for gaming
- Potentially less optimized software
- Camera may not be as refined as the Note 10 Pro Max
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and panel type are missing. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s gaming focus, it’s likely to have a faster refresh rate (a common feature in gaming phones) which isn’t mentioned for the Note 10 Pro Max. This would give the X3 Pro an edge for smoother visuals during fast-paced action. Without further data, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. The absence of specific details makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max is often marketed with a focus on camera quality, suggesting a potentially more sophisticated image processing pipeline. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or the presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), it’s impossible to definitively declare a winner. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are likely of limited practical use.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core, alongside three additional Gold cores clocked at 2.42 GHz, and four Silver cores at 1.78 GHz, compared to the 732G’s 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver. This translates to significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, particularly in graphically intensive tasks. The 7nm process node of the 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. While RAM specifications are not provided, the X3 Pro’s superior chipset will deliver a more responsive experience regardless.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, charging speeds differ. The Poco X3 Pro reaches 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, while the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max takes 30 minutes to reach 60% and 75 minutes for a full charge. This faster charging on the X3 Pro is a practical benefit for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on camera versatility and a slightly more refined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you are a mobile gamer or power user who demands the highest possible performance for the price, and are willing to accept potentially less optimized software.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its efficient thermal management, especially compared to the Snapdragon 888. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the 7nm process node and Xiaomi’s cooling solutions should prevent significant throttling. However, sustained peak performance may eventually lead to some temperature increase.
❓ Is the 33W charging on either phone truly fast charging?
33W charging is considered moderately fast charging in 2024. While not as rapid as 65W or 120W charging solutions, it’s still a significant improvement over slower charging standards. The Poco X3 Pro’s slightly faster charging time (59 minutes to 100%) provides a small convenience advantage.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 732G can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Expect some occasional stuttering or frame drops during intense firefights. The Poco X3 Pro, with its Snapdragon 860, will provide a much smoother and more stable gaming experience at higher settings.
