Xiaomi offers a compelling range of smartphones, but the Poco F3 GT and Redmi Note 10 Pro Max represent distinct philosophies. The F3 GT prioritizes raw performance with its Dimensity 1200 chipset, while the Note 10 Pro Max focuses on a balanced experience with a more efficient Snapdragon 732G and a larger battery. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For gamers and power users, the Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. However, for users prioritizing all-day battery life and a more conservative power draw, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max remains a solid choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 60% in 30 min, 100% in 75 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Night, Glacial Blue, Vintage Bronze | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | M2101K6I | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- Excellent battery life due to Snapdragon 732G efficiency
- Potentially better low-light camera performance with OIS (speculation)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Poco F3 GT
- Slower charging speed (33W vs 67W)
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Exceptional gaming performance with Dimensity 1200
- Ultra-fast 67W charging for minimal downtime
- Superior multitasking capabilities
- Potentially shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in their intended use. The Poco F3 GT, geared towards gaming, likely boasts a higher refresh rate (speculation based on market positioning) to enhance visual fluidity. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, focusing on battery efficiency, may prioritize color accuracy and power saving. The absence of LTPO technology in either suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for optimal power management.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, given its 'Pro' designation, likely features a larger primary sensor than the Poco F3 GT. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) in the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max (speculation based on brand history) would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording. The Poco F3 GT, prioritizing performance, may have a more streamlined camera system focused on speed and convenience. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT, fabricated on a 6nm process, represents a substantial leap in performance over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G (8nm) found in the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. The Dimensity 1200’s octa-core configuration, featuring a high-clocked Cortex-A78 prime core (3.0 GHz), delivers significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a superior gaming experience. The Snapdragon 732G, while capable, is designed for efficiency and will show its limitations in graphically intensive tasks. The 6nm node of the Dimensity 1200 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max aims for longevity, but the Poco F3 GT compensates for a potentially smaller battery (data not provided) with its blazing-fast 67W charging. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s 33W charging takes 75 minutes for a full charge, while the Poco F3 GT achieves 100% in just 42 minutes. This difference is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery. The Dimensity 1200’s higher power consumption will likely result in shorter battery life on the Poco F3 GT compared to the more efficient Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, despite potential battery capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max if you need a reliable daily driver with excellent battery life and a capable camera system for everyday photography. You'll appreciate its consistent performance for social media, browsing, and casual gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize gaming performance, fast charging, and don't mind sacrificing some battery longevity for a more powerful experience. This is the phone for demanding mobile gamers and those who frequently multitask.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and while the 6nm process helps with thermal efficiency, extended gaming at maximum settings can generate heat. Xiaomi likely incorporates cooling solutions, but some throttling may occur to maintain stable performance. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, with its less demanding chipset, will generally run cooler.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max slow compared to the 67W on the Poco F3 GT?
Yes, the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT is significantly faster. While 33W is still respectable, it takes considerably longer to fully charge the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max. If quick top-ups are a priority, the Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max's battery life may mean you don't need to charge it as frequently.
❓ Can the Poco F3 GT handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
The Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT is well-equipped to handle Genshin Impact at high settings, though you may need to adjust some graphical options for a consistently smooth experience. The phone's gaming-focused features, such as dedicated cooling and potentially a high refresh rate display, will contribute to a better gaming experience.
