The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and Samsung Galaxy M52 5G represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset choice. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 732G. While charging is slightly slower, the overall experience is smoother and more future-proof.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, October 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 60% in 30 min, 100% in 75 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Night, Glacial Blue, Vintage Bronze | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Models | M2101K6I | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.0 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 504424 (v9)
GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially lower price
- Good battery endurance
- Less powerful Snapdragon 732G chipset
- Likely lower peak display brightness
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset
- Brighter 777 nit display
- 5G connectivity
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 777 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, whose peak brightness isn't specified but is likely lower. While both offer 'infinite' contrast ratios (typical for AMOLED panels), the higher brightness of the M52 5G translates to a more vibrant and usable experience in direct sunlight. Details regarding refresh rate and panel type (e.g., AMOLED vs Super AMOLED) are missing, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Samsung.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the M52 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s more refined image processing algorithms. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a drawback for both, but a larger sensor (if present in the M52 5G) would be a significant advantage in low-light conditions. We can assume both will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a Cortex-A78 prime core versus the Kryo 470 Gold in the 732G – resulting in faster single-core performance. The 6nm fabrication process also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, meaning the M52 5G is less likely to throttle under sustained load. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural differences and process node give the M52 5G a clear edge in demanding applications and gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s unspecified mAh capacity. However, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G’s 25W charging is slower than the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s 33W charging. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max can reach 60% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 75 minutes, while the M52 5G’s charging times are not specified but will be longer. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max offers faster top-ups, but the similar endurance ratings suggest the difference in daily usage won’t be dramatic.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max if you prioritize a consistently lower price point and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor for everyday tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and 5G connectivity, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy M52 5G handle demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. Its Adreno 642L GPU and efficient architecture will allow you to play Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. The 6nm process also helps prevent overheating during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Galaxy M52 5G a significant drawback compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max's 33W?
While 33W is faster, the difference in real-world charging time isn't massive. Both phones offer all-day battery life, so the slower charging speed on the M52 5G is unlikely to be a major inconvenience for most users. The convenience of faster charging is offset by the M52 5G's superior performance.
❓ Does the Galaxy M52 5G support carrier aggregation for faster 5G speeds?
The Snapdragon 778G supports carrier aggregation, which allows the phone to combine multiple 5G channels for faster download and upload speeds. However, actual speeds will depend on your carrier's network and coverage.
