The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and Motorola Edge 20 Fusion represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max, with its Snapdragon 732G, aims for all-around excellence, while the Edge 20 Fusion leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 800U to deliver a strong performance-per-dollar proposition. This comparison dives deep into their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and slightly faster charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max emerges as the winner. While the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion offers a competitive chipset, the Snapdragon 732G’s optimization and the Redmi’s charging speed provide a smoother, more reliable daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 18 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 60% in 30 min, 100% in 75 min | 30W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Night, Glacial Blue, Vintage Bronze | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Models | M2101K6I | - |
| Price | About 220 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | - |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially better thermal management with Snapdragon 732G
- Optimized software experience
- Chipset may offer slightly lower peak CPU performance
- Software can be heavily customized
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More powerful CPU cores (Dimensity 800U)
- Cleaner software experience (Motorola)
- Potentially better GPU performance
- Slower 30W charging
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display, but differences exist. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the chipsets' ability to drive them. The Dimensity 800U’s more powerful GPU *could* translate to smoother visuals in graphically intensive games, assuming both phones utilize similar panel technology. However, without knowing the panel characteristics, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max's Snapdragon 732G is well-optimized for 1080p displays, suggesting a fluid experience on a standard panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of a main sensor, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s brand reputation suggests a focus on camera features, potentially including more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Dimensity 800U includes a capable ISP, but Motorola’s software tends to prioritize a more natural, less processed look. Users who prefer vibrant, social media-ready photos might lean towards the Redmi, while those seeking accurate color reproduction may prefer the Edge 20 Fusion. The absence of OIS information on either device means low-light performance will heavily rely on software processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 732G (8nm) versus Mediatek’s Dimensity 800U (7nm). The Dimensity 800U, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, offers a theoretical CPU performance advantage over the Snapdragon 732G’s 2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold cores. However, the Snapdragon 732G benefits from Qualcomm’s software optimization and a more mature process node. The 7nm node of the Dimensity 800U *could* lead to higher peak performance, but also potentially more heat generation under sustained load. This means the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max is likely to exhibit less thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions, offering more consistent frame rates. The Snapdragon's Adreno 618 GPU is a strong performer, and will likely provide a comparable gaming experience to the Dimensity 800U's Mali-G57 MC3.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging. Xiaomi claims 60% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 75 minutes, while the Edge 20 Fusion’s charging time is unspecified but will be slower. While battery capacity isn’t provided, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max translates to less downtime. The 8nm process of the Snapdragon 732G *could* also contribute to slightly better battery life due to improved power efficiency, offsetting any potential capacity differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro Max if you need a consistently reliable performer for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, and value a slightly faster charging experience. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications and don't mind potentially managing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, and prefer a cleaner software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800U in the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion overheat during prolonged gaming sessions like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 800U is a capable chipset, but its 7nm process and higher clock speeds can lead to thermal throttling during extended gaming. While it will likely handle moderate gaming well, demanding titles may experience frame drops as the phone heats up. The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 732G, with its 8nm process, is generally better at sustaining performance over longer periods.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max and the 30W charging on the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion?
The Redmi Note 10 Pro Max’s 33W charging is noticeably faster, achieving 60% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 75 minutes according to Xiaomi. The Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W charging will take longer to reach full capacity. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion offer a significant gaming advantage over the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max?
While the Dimensity 800U has a more powerful GPU on paper, the Snapdragon 732G’s optimization and better thermal management often result in a more consistent gaming experience. The Edge 20 Fusion may offer slightly higher frame rates in some titles, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro Max is likely to maintain those frame rates for longer periods without significant throttling.
