Both the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) and the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G market, but they approach it with different philosophies. The Redmi Note 10 Pro prioritizes a balanced feature set and aggressive pricing, while the Galaxy M52 5G leans into performance with a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, all-around experience, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Snapdragon 732G, making it better suited for demanding tasks and future-proofing. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 04 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, October 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.2 x 8.1 mm (6.48 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 618 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 57% in 30 min, 100% in 74 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5020 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Vintage Bronze, Glacial Blue, Dark Night | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Models | M2101K6P | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 0.83 W/kg (head) 0.65 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.0 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 504424 (v9)
GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (India)
- Faster charging speed (33W)
- Potentially more affordable price
- Good all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 732G)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- More powerful chipset (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
- Brighter display (777 nits)
- Better thermal efficiency
- Slower charging speed (25W)
- Potentially higher price
- Similar battery endurance despite chipset efficiency
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 777 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Redmi Note 10 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better outdoor visibility. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the M52 5G’s superior brightness is a clear advantage. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a potentially less vibrant viewing experience. We can assume the Redmi Note 10 Pro uses an AMOLED panel, but lacks the peak brightness of the M52 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. However, the chipset difference suggests the M52 5G benefits from a more powerful image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster processing and potentially better low-light performance. While both likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior processing power will likely result in more detailed and dynamic images. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s camera performance will be adequate, but the M52 5G has the potential for superior image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is powered by the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), featuring a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, alongside 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This is a substantial upgrade over the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Qualcomm SM7150 Snapdragon 732G (8 nm) with its 2x2.3 GHz Kryo 470 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver configuration. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The M52 5G will deliver a smoother experience in graphically intensive games and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s unspecified mAh capacity. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Redmi Note 10 Pro supports 33W wired charging, reaching 57% in 30 minutes and 100% in 74 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G offers 25W wired charging, which is slower. The similar endurance ratings suggest the more efficient Snapdragon 778G in the M52 5G offsets the slower charging speed, providing comparable real-world usage time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (India) if you need a reliable daily driver with a good camera and long-lasting battery life, and are operating on a strict budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G if you prioritize performance for gaming, multitasking, and want a brighter, more vibrant display, and are willing to spend a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy M52 5G get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is built on a 6nm process, which offers improved thermal efficiency compared to the 8nm Snapdragon 732G in the Redmi Note 10 Pro. While some heat is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the M52 5G is less prone to significant throttling, maintaining higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Galaxy M52 5G a significant drawback compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro's 33W?
While 33W is faster on paper, both phones achieve similar endurance ratings. The more efficient Snapdragon 778G in the M52 5G consumes less power, mitigating the impact of the slower charging speed. You're unlikely to notice a substantial difference in daily usage.
❓ How does the camera performance of the Galaxy M52 5G compare to the Redmi Note 10 Pro in low-light conditions?
The Galaxy M52 5G’s Snapdragon 778G features a more advanced ISP, enabling better noise reduction and detail preservation in low-light scenarios. Expect cleaner, more vibrant photos from the M52 5G in challenging lighting conditions.
