Xiaomi's Redmi lineup offers a broad spectrum of devices, but choosing between the flagship-leaning K90 and the well-rounded Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) requires careful consideration. The K90 boasts a cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, while the Note 11 Pro+ 5G focuses on delivering a solid experience at a more accessible price point. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device aligns with your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi K90 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset delivers significantly faster processing speeds and superior gaming capabilities. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who value a balanced feature set and efficient power management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 23 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS
22.5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Po 7100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Purple | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | 2510DRK44C | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K90
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- 100W wired charging for rapid replenishment
- Potential for advanced display features (LTPO, higher refresh rate)
- Likely higher price point
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- More affordable price
- Good all-around performance for everyday use
- Efficient power management for longer battery life
- Slower processor compared to the K90
- Slower charging speed (67W)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature AMOLED panels – a standard for Xiaomi’s Redmi series – the specifics are missing. However, the K90’s higher processing power suggests a potential for higher refresh rates and more sophisticated display features. The Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) likely targets a 120Hz refresh rate, but the K90 could push this further. The K90’s chipset could also drive more advanced display technologies like LTPO for variable refresh rates, improving power efficiency. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown, but the K90’s premium positioning suggests a more refined display experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, analysis is limited. However, the K90’s flagship status suggests a more advanced camera system, potentially including a larger sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) likely features a capable camera setup for its price range, but it will likely fall short of the K90 in low-light performance and dynamic range. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it difficult to assess video recording capabilities, but the K90 is more likely to include this feature.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Redmi K90’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) is a powerhouse, featuring an octa-core CPU with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm), which utilizes Kryo 660 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 3nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite offers superior power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 695. This translates to sustained performance during demanding tasks and less throttling. The K90 will excel in gaming, video editing, and multitasking, while the Note 11 Pro+ 5G is better suited for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Battery Life
The Redmi K90’s 100W wired charging is a major advantage, allowing for significantly faster charging times compared to the Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging. Xiaomi claims the Note 11 Pro+ 5G reaches 100% in 42 minutes, while the K90’s 100W charging should achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes. The K90 also includes 100W PPS and 22.5W reverse wired charging, offering greater versatility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the K90’s more efficient chipset could offset a potentially smaller battery size, delivering comparable or even better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K90 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. You'll also benefit from the faster 100W charging and potential for longer software support. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a more affordable device with a good all-around experience, prioritizing battery life and a reliable camera system for everyday use, without the need for top-tier processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a smooth experience in demanding games like Genshin Impact, even at lower settings. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Redmi K90’s Snapdragon 8 Elite is designed for such titles and will provide a far superior gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Redmi K90 compared to the 67W charging on the Note 11 Pro+ 5G in real-world usage?
The 100W charging on the K90 can realistically shave off 15-20 minutes from a full charge compared to the Note 11 Pro+ 5G. While the Note 11 Pro+ 5G reaches 100% in 42 minutes, the K90 should achieve a full charge in around 25-30 minutes. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Redmi K90's Snapdragon 8 Elite generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite is a powerful chip, and heat generation is a potential concern. However, the 3nm fabrication process and Xiaomi’s thermal management solutions should mitigate this issue. Expect some warming, but the K90 is designed to sustain peak performance for extended periods without significant throttling, unlike older generation flagship chips.
