Xiaomi Redmi K90 vs Motorola Edge 30 Neo: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K90 is the clear winner. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo offers a compelling alternative with its respectable battery endurance and more refined, balanced experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K90 | Motorola Edge 30 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 23 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 75.3 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.96 x 0.31 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| - | Splash and dust resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1156 x 2510 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 106.5 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 60mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 22.5W reverse wired | 68W wired 5W wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Po 7100 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Purple | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | 2510DRK44C | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 104h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 380818 (v9) GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K90
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Potential for advanced camera features
- Battery life potentially compromised by high performance
- Thermal throttling a potential concern
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Solid battery endurance (104h rating)
- Bright and vibrant display (1004 nits)
- Sleek and lightweight design
- Significantly lower performance than the K90
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a display capable of reaching 1004 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility outdoors. While the Redmi K90’s display specs are currently unavailable, the Edge 30 Neo’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a strong visual experience. The K90’s potential for higher refresh rates or resolution would be a key differentiator, but without those details, the Edge 30 Neo currently holds an advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the K90’s flagship chipset likely supports more advanced image processing algorithms and potentially higher-resolution video recording. The Edge 30 Neo’s camera performance will likely be adequate for social media and casual photography, but the K90 has the potential for significantly better image quality, especially in low-light conditions, assuming it features a comparable or superior sensor.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi K90’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite, built on a 3nm process, features an octa-core CPU with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for peak performance, significantly outclassing the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with its Kryo 660 cores peaking at 2.2 GHz. The 3nm node of the K90’s chipset promises superior thermal efficiency, but sustained performance will depend on Xiaomi’s cooling solution. The Edge 30 Neo, while capable for everyday tasks, will struggle with graphically intensive games and applications compared to the K90.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo has an endurance rating of 104 hours, indicating solid battery life. The Redmi K90’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 100W wired charging (supporting PD3.0, QC3+, and 100W PPS) is a major advantage, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging and 5W wireless charging are respectable, but pale in comparison to the K90’s speed. The K90 also offers 22.5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Edge 30 Neo.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K90 if you demand the highest possible Android performance for gaming or demanding applications and value incredibly fast 100W charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prioritize a sleek design, solid battery life, and a more streamlined software experience without sacrificing 5G connectivity, and are less concerned with pushing the absolute performance limits.