Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max vs OnePlus 11R: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing absolute performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max is the clear winner, thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s Oryon CPU cores and 3nm process. However, the OnePlus 11R remains a compelling option for those seeking excellent performance and 100W charging at a potentially lower cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max | OnePlus 11R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (3CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA 800 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 23 | 2023, February 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 23 | Available. Released 2023, February 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.8 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 163.4 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm (6.43 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 18GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 50W wireless 22.5W reverse wireless | 100W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7560 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Denim Blue, Lamborgini White | Galactic Silver, Sonic Black, Solar Red |
| Models | - | CPH2487 |
| Price | About 500 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.61 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor
- Potentially superior thermal management due to 3nm process
- 50W wireless and 22.5W reverse wireless charging
- Likely higher price point
- Potential for software bugs common with early releases
OnePlus 11R
- Proven Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Competitive price point
- Fast 100W wired charging
- Older generation processor
- Lacks wireless charging capabilities
Display Comparison
While both phones are expected to feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (specs not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The K90 Pro Max’s Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 will handle graphically intensive games and UI animations with greater ease. Without display specs, we can assume OnePlus will focus on color accuracy, while Xiaomi may prioritize peak brightness to showcase the chipset's capabilities.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, given Xiaomi’s recent focus on camera technology, the K90 Pro Max is likely to feature a more advanced camera system, potentially with a larger main sensor and improved image processing algorithms. The OnePlus 11R will likely offer a solid camera experience, but may prioritize a more natural color profile, while Xiaomi could lean towards more vibrant, social media-ready images.
Performance
The Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 in the K90 Pro Max represents a significant architectural shift. Its Oryon V3 Phoenix cores (2x4.6 GHz L + 6x3.62 GHz M) are designed for superior single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510). The 3nm process node of the 8 Elite Gen 5 also promises improved power efficiency, potentially leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The 8+ Gen 1 is still a very capable chip, but the K90 Pro Max is expected to deliver a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in CPU-bound tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 100W wired charging, promising incredibly fast top-ups. The K90 Pro Max further adds 50W wireless and 22.5W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5’s improved efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size in the K90 Pro Max, resulting in comparable real-world battery life. The 100W charging on both devices should deliver a full charge in under 30 minutes.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max if you demand the fastest possible Android performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if you value the latest technology, including potentially superior thermal management. Buy the OnePlus 11R if you prioritize a balanced experience with proven performance, fast charging, and a potentially more affordable price point, making it ideal for everyday use and casual gaming.