Xiaomi K90 Pro Max vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and blazing-fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers a significant performance advantage, and 100W charging is unmatched. However, the Pixel 7 Pro remains a compelling choice for those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem and prioritizing camera software.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 23 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 23 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragon Crystal Glass), aluminum alloy frame, fiber-reinforced plastic back or silicone polymer back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.3 x 77.8 x 7.9 mm (6.43 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Xiaomi Dragon Crystal Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2608 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~416 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 116.6 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 68B colors, 2560Hz PWM, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 3500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L + 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 840 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 115mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (30cm - ∞), OIS, 5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.4, 18mm, 102˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (wide), 1/3.44", 0.64µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5.0, ASHA, MIHC | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, Display Port, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100W PPS 50W wireless 22.5W reverse wireless | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7560 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Denim Blue, Lamborgini White | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | - | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | About 500 EUR | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max
- Significantly faster charging (100W)
- More powerful processor (Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5)
- Potentially better thermal management due to 3nm process
- Camera software may not match Pixel's computational photography
- Software experience may not be as refined as Pixel's
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Excellent camera software and image processing
- Seamless Google ecosystem integration
- High display brightness and contrast
- Slower charging speed (23W)
- Less powerful processor (Tensor G2)
- Potential for thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1090 nits, providing excellent visibility outdoors. While the K90 Pro Max’s display specs are not provided, Xiaomi typically equips its flagships with high-brightness panels. The Pixel 7 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without PWM frequency data for the K90 Pro Max, it’s difficult to assess potential flicker-related issues for sensitive users, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s display is generally considered comfortable for extended viewing. The absence of LTPO information for the K90 Pro Max means it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as some competitors, potentially impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are equipped with capable camera systems, but approach image processing differently. The Pixel 7 Pro is renowned for its computational photography prowess, leveraging Google’s AI algorithms to produce stunning images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While the Pixel 7 Pro’s sensor details aren’t specified, its focus is on software optimization. The K90 Pro Max’s camera specs are currently unknown, but Xiaomi often prioritizes high-resolution sensors. Without detailed sensor information for the K90 Pro Max, it’s difficult to directly compare image quality, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s established track record in computational photography gives it an edge for point-and-shoot simplicity and consistent results.
Performance
The Xiaomi K90 Pro Max’s Qualcomm SM8850-AC Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3nm) represents a significant leap in mobile processing. Its octa-core CPU, featuring 2x4.6 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix L cores and 6x3.62 GHz Oryon V3 Phoenix M cores, promises substantial performance gains over the Pixel 7 Pro’s Google Tensor G2 (5nm). The Tensor G2, with its 2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is optimized for machine learning tasks, but falls behind in raw CPU and GPU power. The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 offers superior thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The K90 Pro Max is expected to excel in graphically intensive applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
Both the Pixel 7 Pro and the K90 Pro Max achieve an endurance rating of 83 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the K90 Pro Max’s charging capabilities are dramatically superior. Its 100W wired charging, supporting PD3.0, QC3+, and 100W PPS, can fully charge the battery significantly faster than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The K90 Pro Max also offers 50W wireless charging and 22.5W reverse wireless charging, while the Pixel 7 Pro provides 23W wireless and reverse wireless charging. The K90 Pro Max’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery life differences, offering greater convenience for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K90 Pro Max if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, require the fastest possible charging speeds, and value raw hardware power. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize computational photography and Google’s AI features, and value a refined, polished user interface.