Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra vs Oppo Find X7 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance

The Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra and Oppo Find X7 Ultra represent compelling choices in the high-end Android space. The K80 Ultra leverages the cutting-edge Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ chipset, while the Find X7 Ultra opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects their key differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with a more efficient 4nm process, offers a slight edge in thermal management and overall stability. However, the K80 Ultra presents a strong value proposition with its Dimensity 9400+.

PHONES
Phone Names Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra Oppo Find X7 Ultra
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2025, June 262024, January 08
StatusAvailable. Released 2025, June 26Available. Released 2024, January 12
Body
BuildGlass front, aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass) or eco leather back, aluminum frame
Dimensions163.1 x 77.9 x 8.2 mm (6.42 x 3.07 x 0.32 in)164.3 x 76.2 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.37 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight219 g (7.72 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
Display
ProtectionScratch/drop-resistant glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution1280 x 2772 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~447 ppi density)1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density)
Size6.83 inches, 114.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (typ), 2600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
OSAndroid 15, HyperOS 2Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm-
FeaturesColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (25cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/4.3, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 14mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.95", 1.0µm, PDAF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRPanorama
Single20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 55.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASSGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS
RadioUnspecifiedNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging100W wired, PD3.0 Bypass charging100W wired, PD, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 26 min 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 7410 mAh5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGray, White, Blue, GreenBlack, Dark Blue, Light Brown
Models-PHY110, PHY120
PriceAbout 310 EUR$ 546.64

Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra

  • Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
  • Cutting-edge 3nm chipset technology
  • 100W wired charging with bypass charging

  • Unknown battery life and charging speed details
  • Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load

Oppo Find X7 Ultra

  • Excellent battery life (12:47h active use)
  • Faster charging (100% in 26 minutes) and wireless charging
  • Thermally efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 3

  • Slightly lower peak CPU clock speed
  • Potentially higher price point

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1165 nits, suggesting a superior outdoor visibility experience compared to the K80 Ultra, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely employ high-refresh-rate AMOLED panels, the Find X7 Ultra’s brightness advantage is a tangible benefit for users in sunny environments. The absence of LTPO information for the K80 Ultra suggests it may not dynamically adjust refresh rates as efficiently as the Find X7 Ultra, potentially impacting battery life.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera details for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, Oppo’s Find X series is renowned for its camera capabilities, suggesting a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors. The Find X7 Ultra likely benefits from Qualcomm’s ISP enhancements within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. The K80 Ultra, while likely equipped with a capable camera system, may prioritize computational photography features over raw sensor size or lens quality. We can assume both will offer multi-camera setups, but the Find X7 Ultra is likely to deliver more consistent and refined image quality.

Performance

The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi K80 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, promising exceptional single-core performance. However, the Oppo Find X7 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.3 GHz. The 4nm process of the Snapdragon offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The K80 Ultra’s CPU configuration includes three Cortex-X4 cores, while the Find X7 Ultra has only one, but the Snapdragon’s architecture is optimized for sustained performance. The K80 Ultra's newer architecture may offer a slight edge in specific workloads, but the Snapdragon's thermal management is a significant advantage.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X7 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 12:47h of active use. While the K80 Ultra’s battery capacity is unknown, the Find X7 Ultra’s endurance is a significant benefit for power users. Both devices support 100W wired charging, but the Find X7 Ultra charges to 100% in 26 minutes, while the K80 Ultra’s charging time is unspecified. Furthermore, the Find X7 Ultra adds 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging, offering greater versatility and convenience.

Buying Guide

Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Ultra if you need a powerhouse processor for demanding tasks and appreciate a potentially lower price point. It’s ideal for users who frequently engage in CPU-intensive applications and value the latest chipset technology. Buy the Oppo Find X7 Ultra if you prefer a more refined, all-around experience with a focus on battery life, faster charging speeds (including wireless), and a proven track record of software optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9400+ in the K80 Ultra suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 9400+ is a powerful chipset, its 3nm process doesn't automatically guarantee superior thermal performance. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3's 4nm process and Qualcomm's thermal management technologies are likely to provide more consistent performance under sustained load. Expect some throttling on the K80 Ultra, but the extent will depend on the phone's cooling system.
❓ How does the 50W wireless charging on the Find X7 Ultra compare to the 100W wired charging of both phones?
While 100W wired charging is faster for a full charge, 50W wireless charging offers convenience. The Find X7 Ultra can reach a substantial charge overnight without needing a cable. The 100W wired charging on both phones is ideal for quick top-ups when you're short on time, but the Find X7 Ultra provides a valuable wireless charging option.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speeds (3.63 GHz vs 3.3 GHz) between the Dimensity 9400+ and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 noticeable in everyday use?
The difference in clock speed is unlikely to be noticeable in most everyday tasks like browsing, social media, or video playback. Both chipsets are incredibly powerful. The difference will primarily manifest in highly demanding applications like video editing, 3D rendering, or graphically intensive games, where the K80 Ultra *may* have a slight edge, but thermal throttling could negate this advantage.