Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro vs. Samsung Galaxy S24+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and blazing-fast charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset delivers superior performance. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24+ excels in sustained performance, display brightness, and offers a more polished software experience, making it ideal for everyday users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November 27 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 75 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.95 x 0.33 in) | 158.5 x 75.9 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 212 g or 217 g (7.48 oz) | 196 g or 197 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Longjing glass 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (HBM), 3200 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520)10-core (1x3.2GHz Cortex-X4 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.6GHz Cortex-A720 & 4x1.95GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) - USA/Canada/ChinaExynos 2400 (4 nm) - International |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) - USA/Canada/ChinaXclipse 940 - International |
| OS | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 24mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 60mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 32 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.94", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55" 1.4µm, Super Steady video |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 28 min 50W wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 4900 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Mint, Lamborgini Green, Lamborgini Black | Onyx Black, Marble Grey, Cobalt Violet, Amber Yellow, Jade Green, Sandstone Orange, Sapphire Blue |
| Models | 24122RKC7C | SM-S926B, SM-S926B/DS, SM-S926U, SM-S926U1, SM-S926W, SM-S926N, SM-S9260, SM-S926E, SM-S926E/DS |
| Price | About 500 EUR | $ 429.50 / € 549.00 / £ 445.98 |
| SAR | - | 1.16 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.74 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro
- Unmatched CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Thermal throttling potential under sustained load
- Software experience may not be as refined as Samsung’s
Samsung Galaxy S24+
- Excellent battery life (12:30h active use)
- Brighter and more color-accurate display
- Polished software experience with Samsung’s features
- Slower charging speeds compared to K80 Pro
- Chipset performance may be lower than K80 Pro (depending on region)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ boasts a peak brightness of 1452 nits, significantly outshining the likely (though unconfirmed) brightness of the K80 Pro. While the K80 Pro’s panel specifications are unknown, Samsung’s display technology is renowned for its color accuracy and outdoor visibility. The S24+ likely utilizes LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to battery efficiency. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, but Samsung’s manufacturing process typically yields slightly tighter tolerances.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks specific camera details for both devices. However, given Samsung’s history, the S24+ likely features a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes, particularly for the main camera. Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) is expected on both, but Samsung often implements more advanced OIS systems. The K80 Pro may focus on raw sensor capabilities, while the S24+ will likely prioritize computational photography and scene optimization. The 2MP macro camera, if present on either device, is unlikely to be a significant differentiator.
Performance
The Xiaomi K80 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) chipset, featuring Oryon V2 Phoenix cores, promises a substantial performance leap over the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) found in the US/Canada/China S24+ variant. The K80 Pro’s CPU configuration (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz) suggests a focus on peak performance, while the S24+'s (1x3.39GHz + 3x3.1GHz + 2x2.9GHz + 2x2.2GHz) is more balanced. However, the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and the Exynos 2400 (International S24+) offers better thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during extended gaming sessions. The K80 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM speed is crucial for maximizing the chipset’s potential.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24+ achieves an impressive 12:30h of active use, demonstrating strong battery optimization. The K80 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging (100% in 28 minutes) and 50W wireless charging significantly outperform the S24+'s 45W wired (65% in 30 minutes) and 15W wireless (Qi) charging. While the K80 Pro’s faster charging can offset a potentially smaller battery, the S24+’s efficiency provides a longer overall usage time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K80 Pro if you need uncompromising CPU and GPU performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24+ if you prefer a more balanced experience with excellent battery life, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the seamless integration of Samsung’s software features and ecosystem.