Xiaomi Redmi K70 vs. vivo iQOO 12 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 provides a noticeable performance uplift, especially in sustained workloads, and the addition of 50W wireless charging adds significant convenience. However, the Redmi K70 remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K70 | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 29 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 29 | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Purple | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | 23113RKC6C | V2329A |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 650 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K70
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 120W wired charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor
- Lacks wireless charging
- Older Snapdragon generation
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor
- 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless
- Superior performance in demanding tasks
- Higher price point
- Potential for increased thermal throttling under extreme load (though mitigated by Gen 3 optimizations)
Display Comparison
While both devices likely feature high-refresh-rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Redmi K70’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 will deliver a smooth visual experience, but the iQOO 12 Pro’s 8 Gen 3 offers a more responsive feel, particularly in graphically demanding games. The iQOO 12 Pro’s chipset is better equipped to handle complex rendering tasks, potentially resulting in higher and more stable frame rates.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, iQOO phones often prioritize camera performance, and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s improved ISP (Image Signal Processor) will likely result in better image processing capabilities, including faster autofocus and improved low-light performance. The Redmi K70 will still deliver excellent image quality, but the iQOO 12 Pro has the potential for a more refined and versatile camera experience. The inclusion of a dedicated ISP in the Gen 3 allows for more complex computational photography algorithms.
Performance
The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) represents a significant architectural leap over the Redmi K70’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Gen 3 features the newer Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, compared to the K70’s 3.2 GHz Cortex-X3. This, combined with the improved Cortex-A720 performance cores (3x3.2 GHz in iQOO vs 2x2.8 GHz A715/A710 in Redmi), translates to a roughly 10-20% performance increase in CPU-bound tasks. The iQOO 12 Pro’s GPU also benefits from architectural improvements, offering superior graphics performance. The 4nm process node in both chips contributes to thermal efficiency, but the Gen 3’s optimizations should result in less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 120W wired charging, promising a full charge in approximately 18 minutes. However, the iQOO 12 Pro distinguishes itself with the addition of 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. This provides significantly more flexibility for users who prefer cable-free charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the iQOO 12 Pro’s more efficient chipset and charging options offer a more convenient and versatile power solution.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 if you need a powerful flagship experience without breaking the bank, and are comfortable with relying solely on wired charging. It’s ideal for users who prioritize a balance of performance and affordability. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you demand the absolute best performance available, value the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to pay a premium for the latest Snapdragon technology.