Xiaomi Redmi K70 vs OnePlus 12R: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more streamlined software experience, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 emerges as the winner. Its 120W charging significantly reduces downtime, and while the OnePlus 12R boasts impressive battery endurance, the K70’s faster replenishment is a crucial advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K70 | OnePlus 12R |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, November 29 | 2024, January 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, November 29 | Available. Released 2024, February 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.9 x 75 x 8.2 mm (6.33 x 2.95 x 0.32 in) | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 209 g (7.37 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 4000 nits (peak) | LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, OxygenOS 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 18 min | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Blue/Green, Purple | Iron Gray, Cool Blue, Electric Violet, Sunset Dune |
| Models | 23113RKC6C | CPH2609, CPH2585, CPH2611 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 410.84 / $ 399.95 / £ 649.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.82 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K70
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Potentially more streamlined software experience (Xiaomi's MIUI)
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides flagship-level performance
- Battery capacity not specified, potentially smaller than OnePlus 12R
- MIUI can be resource intensive
OnePlus 12R
- Excellent 14:32h active use battery life
- High peak brightness of 1181 nits
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides flagship-level performance
- Slower 100W charging (26 minutes to full)
- OxygenOS, while clean, has seen changes in recent versions
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 12R boasts a measured peak brightness of 1181 nits, a strong figure ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Redmi K70’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable brightness level given its flagship positioning. Both phones likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of LTPO information for either device suggests they may not offer dynamically adaptive refresh rates, potentially impacting battery life during prolonged use at higher refresh rates. Bezels are likely similar, focusing on maximizing screen real estate.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensor performance. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of details suggests neither phone prioritizes a groundbreaking camera system, focusing instead on delivering a solid, all-around imaging experience. We can assume both will offer standard features like HDR and night mode, but image processing styles will likely differ, impacting color science and dynamic range.
Performance
Both the Redmi K70 and OnePlus 12R are powered by the Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset, featuring an identical CPU configuration: 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710, and 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510. This means raw processing power will be nearly indistinguishable between the two. The 4nm fabrication process ensures excellent thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. However, the effectiveness of each phone’s cooling solution (not specified) will ultimately determine real-world sustained performance. RAM specifications are missing, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The OnePlus 12R shines with an active use battery score of 14:32h, indicating exceptional endurance. The Redmi K70’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 120W wired charging is a significant advantage. The OnePlus 12R’s 100W charging takes 26 minutes to reach 100%, while the Redmi K70 achieves the same in just 18 minutes. This 8-minute difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The faster charging of the K70 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and appreciate a phone that can fully replenish its battery in under 20 minutes. Buy the OnePlus 12R if you prioritize maximizing battery life and prefer a longer-lasting device between charges, even if it means a slower charging cycle. Both are excellent choices for gamers and power users.