Xiaomi Redmi K60E vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Redmi K60E thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and wireless charging. While the K60E offers a strong Mediatek alternative, the F5 Pro's overall package provides a more premium experience, especially for gamers and power users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K60E | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, White |
| Models | 22122RK93C | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 300 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K60E
- Excellent value for money
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Efficient Mediatek Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Good battery life
- Less powerful than the Poco F5 Pro
- Likely lower display brightness
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Wireless charging support
- Fast wired charging (67W)
- Potentially higher price
- Camera performance may not be significantly better than K60E
- May experience slightly more heat under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 1059 nits compared to the K60E's likely lower brightness (spec not provided, estimated around 600-800 nits). Both feature AMOLED panels with smooth refresh rates, but the F5 Pro's superior brightness makes it more visible in direct sunlight and offers a more vibrant viewing experience. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the F5 Pro is a nominal value, but indicates excellent black levels.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, the Poco F5 Pro, with its Snapdragon processor, often benefits from better image processing and video recording capabilities. Expect slightly better dynamic range and low-light performance from the F5 Pro. The K60E's camera is still expected to be good, but likely not as refined.
Performance
Here, the Poco F5 Pro takes a clear lead. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, offering noticeably faster performance than the Dimensity 8200. This translates to smoother gaming, quicker app loading times, and better multitasking capabilities. While the Dimensity 8200 is no slouch, the 8+ Gen 1 provides a more premium feel.
Battery Life
Both devices offer a respectable endurance rating of 99h, suggesting excellent battery life. The Poco F5 Pro's inclusion of 30W wireless charging provides added convenience, while the K60E is limited to 67W wired charging. Both offer fast charging speeds, but the wireless option on the F5 Pro is a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K60E is ideal for users prioritizing a smooth, everyday experience and efficient performance without breaking the bank. The Poco F5 Pro is the better choice for gamers, content creators, and those who value a brighter display, faster charging (including wireless), and a more powerful processor.