Xiaomi continues to dominate the mid-range smartphone market with compelling options like the Redmi K60E and the Poco F5. Both offer impressive specs at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the perfect device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 edges out the Redmi K60E thanks to its superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. While the K60E boasts a powerful Dimensity 8200, the F5's overall package delivers a more polished and performant experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 27 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0 | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Green | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22122RK93C | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 300 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Xiaomi Redmi K60E
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Good AMOLED display
- Competitive price
- Less bright display than Poco F5
- Slightly slower charging
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Excellent battery life
- Faster charging (46 mins)
- Generally better camera performance
- Design might be less premium than some competitors
- Could be slightly more expensive than K60E depending on region
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering significantly better visibility in direct sunlight. While the Redmi K60E has a good quality AMOLED panel, it lacks the F5's sheer brightness. The F5's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F5 likely has a slight edge in image processing and overall consistency. The Redmi K60E's camera is still very good, but the F5's software optimizations and potentially better sensor choices give it a slight advantage. Detailed camera samples and comparisons would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Redmi K60E's Dimensity 8200. While both are capable processors, the Snapdragon generally offers better efficiency and smoother multitasking. Gaming performance is also slightly better on the F5.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 demonstrates exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours and an active use score of 11:52 hours. The Redmi K60E's battery performance is respectable, but doesn't quite match the F5's longevity. The F5's faster charging (46 minutes to 100%) further enhances its appeal.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K60E is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming and demanding tasks, and who don't mind a slightly less vibrant display. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is the better choice for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a brighter screen, faster charging, and excellent battery life, making it a great all-around performer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi K60E good for gaming?
Yes, the Redmi K60E's Dimensity 8200 chipset is capable of handling most mobile games smoothly, but the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 might offer slightly better performance and efficiency.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Poco F5 consistently demonstrates superior battery life, offering significantly longer usage times and a faster charging speed.
