The Xiaomi Redmi K60 and Realme GT Neo 5 240W represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive upper-midrange smartphone market. Both leverage the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, but diverge significantly in their approach to charging and overall user experience. This comparison dissects these differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around balance, the Xiaomi Redmi K60 offers a more complete package. However, the Realme GT Neo 5 240W is the clear winner for those who absolutely demand the fastest possible charging speeds, even if it means some trade-offs in wireless charging and potentially thermal management.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, February 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 01 | Available. Released 2023, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm | 163.9 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g or 204 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| | - | Illuminated RGB (on the back) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/3.3, 20mm (microscope) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (dual side) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+
30W wireless | 240W wired, 50% in 4 min, 100% in 10 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | 4600 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Blue, Green | Purple, Black, White |
| Models | - | RMX3708 |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 440 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K60
- Balanced overall package
- 30W wireless charging support
- Potentially better thermal management due to larger chassis
- Significantly slower charging than the GT Neo 5
- Slightly lower CPU clock speed
Realme GT Neo 5 240W
- Revolutionary 240W charging – full charge in 10 minutes
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed
- Designed for gaming with potentially aggressive performance profiles
- No wireless charging support
- Potential for higher temperatures under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize AMOLED panels, but detailed specifications like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing. Given the market positioning, we can assume both offer at least 120Hz refresh rates. The Realme GT Neo 5 likely prioritizes peak brightness for gaming, while the Redmi K60 may focus on color accuracy. The absence of LTPO technology in either suggests potential for higher power consumption at lower refresh rates compared to flagship devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely feature a primary sensor around 50MP. The Realme GT Neo 5, being marketed as a gaming phone, might prioritize image processing for vibrant colors and dynamic range, while the Redmi K60 could lean towards more natural color reproduction. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the main sensor would be a significant advantage for video recording and low-light photography, but this is unconfirmed for either device.
Performance
Both phones are powered by the Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset, but the Realme GT Neo 5 boasts a slightly higher CPU clock speed (3.19 GHz vs 3.0 GHz on the Redmi K60). While this difference is marginal in everyday tasks, it *could* translate to a small performance edge in CPU-intensive applications. Both utilize an Octa-core configuration with 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 cores. Thermal management will be crucial; the 4nm process helps, but sustained loads could lead to throttling. The Redmi K60's larger surface area might offer slightly better heat dissipation.
Battery Life
This is where the Realme GT Neo 5 truly shines. Its 240W wired charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 10 minutes. The Redmi K60’s 67W wired charging, while respectable, pales in comparison. The Realme GT Neo 5 sacrifices wireless charging entirely, while the Redmi K60 offers 30W wireless charging. The actual battery capacity is unknown, but the Realme’s extreme charging speed mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. Users who frequently top up their phones will benefit immensely from the GT Neo 5’s charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 if you need a balanced smartphone with solid performance, reliable 67W wired and 30W wireless charging, and a more mature software experience. Buy the Realme GT Neo 5 240W if you prioritize minimizing downtime with its revolutionary 240W charging, and are willing to accept a lack of wireless charging and potentially higher peak temperatures during intensive tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the 240W charging of the Realme GT Neo 5 degrade the battery health faster?
While 240W charging is incredibly fast, Realme has implemented safety protocols and optimized charging algorithms to minimize battery degradation. However, long-term effects are still unknown, and frequent use of extremely fast charging *could* potentially reduce battery lifespan compared to slower charging methods.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in either phone throttle significantly during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to throttle under sustained load, but the 4nm process helps mitigate this. Both phones will likely experience some throttling, but the Redmi K60’s potentially larger chassis might offer slightly better heat dissipation, leading to less aggressive throttling.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the Realme GT Neo 5 a dealbreaker for most users?
It depends on your charging habits. If you rely heavily on wireless charging, the GT Neo 5 is not the phone for you. However, if you primarily charge your phone overnight with a wired charger, the lack of wireless charging is unlikely to be a significant issue, especially given the incredibly fast 240W wired charging.
