Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Redmi K60 Pro and Poco F5 are two of their latest contenders, both boasting powerful features. But which one offers the best overall package? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, from display quality to battery life, to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K60 Pro takes the performance crown with its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, offering significantly faster speeds. However, the Poco F5 shines with its excellent battery life and vibrant display, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity and visual experience. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 27 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 01 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.9 mm | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g or 205 g (7.09 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 740 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, MIUI 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 4.0
UFS 3.1 - 128GB only | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 54 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a+Bc), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 100% in 19 min
30W wireless | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Mint, Champion Black | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22127RK46C | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- 120W fast charging
- Likely superior camera system
- Premium build quality (expected)
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Poco F5
- Higher price point
- May lack some of the Poco's unique features
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Exceptional battery life
- Bright and vibrant display
- More affordable price
- Good overall performance for the price
- Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 is less powerful than 8 Gen 2
- Camera system may be less advanced
- Build quality might be slightly less premium
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 boasts a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, making it exceptionally visible outdoors. Its contrast ratio is reported as infinite (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Redmi K60 Pro's display is also excellent, though specific brightness figures are less readily available, but it's expected to be very good. Both phones likely use AMOLED panels with 120Hz refresh rates for smooth scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but details are limited. The Poco F5 is described as having a 'Photo / Video' camera setup, suggesting a versatile system. The Redmi K60 Pro is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing capabilities. Expect good image quality from both, but the K60 Pro likely has the edge in low-light performance and overall detail.
Performance
Here's where the Redmi K60 Pro truly shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a flagship chipset, significantly outperforming the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance on the K60 Pro. The Poco F5 is still a capable performer, but it won't match the raw power of its sibling.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 excels in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours and an active use score of 11:52 hours. This suggests exceptional longevity. The Redmi K60 Pro, while having a decent battery, doesn't match the Poco F5's endurance. However, its 120W wired charging allows for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Xiaomi Redmi K60 Pro? Power users, gamers, and those demanding top-tier performance will appreciate the K60 Pro's flagship chipset. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Users prioritizing long battery life, a bright and vivid display, and a more budget-friendly price point will find the Poco F5 a compelling option.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Redmi K60 Pro worth the extra money?
If you prioritize performance and don't mind paying a premium, the K60 Pro is worth it. However, the Poco F5 offers excellent value for money with its long battery life and bright display.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Redmi K60 Pro is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset.
