Xiaomi Redmi K50 vs Poco F4: A Head-to-Head Showdown

Xiaomi offers a plethora of excellent mid-range phones, and the Redmi K50 and Poco F4 are two of their most compelling options. Both pack impressive features at competitive prices, but cater to slightly different user priorities. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right one for you.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Poco F4 edges out the Redmi K50 thanks to its brighter display and the consistently strong Snapdragon 870. While the K50's Dimensity 8100 offers competitive performance, the F4's overall package, including its excellent screen, makes it the slightly better choice for most users.

PHONES
Phone Names	Xiaomi Redmi K50	Xiaomi Poco F4

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands	1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
	CDMA2000 1x	-

Launch
Announced	2022, March 17	2022, June 23
Status	Available. Released 2022, March 22	Available. Released 2022, June 27

Body
Build	Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back	Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back
Dimensions	163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in)	163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	201 g (7.09 oz)	195 g (6.88 oz)
	IP53, dust and splash resistant	IP53, dust and splash resistant

Display
Protection	Corning Gorilla Glass Victus	Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution	1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio)	6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak)	AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak)

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)	Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585)
Chipset	Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm)	Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm)
GPU	Mali-G610	Adreno 650
OS	Android 12, MIUI 13	Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO

Memory
Card slot	No	No
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM	128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM
	UFS 3.1	UFS 3.1

Main Camera
Features	Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single	20 MP, (wide)	-
Triple	48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro)	64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video	4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS	4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps

Selfie camera
Single	20 MP, (wide)	20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video	1080p@30/120fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	No	No
35mm jack	No	No
Loudspeaker	Yes, with stereo speakers	Yes, with stereo speakers
	24-bit/192kHz audio	24-bit/192kHz audio

Comms
Bluetooth	5.3, A2DP, LE	5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)	GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)
Radio	No	No
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 30 min	67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min
Type	Li-Po 5500 mAh	Li-Po 4500 mAh

Misc
Colors	Black, Gray, Blue, Green	Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green
Models	22041211AC	22021211RG, 22021211RI
Price	About 480 EUR	₹ 16,999

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 101h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-26.1 LUFS (Good)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Xiaomi Redmi K50

Powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset
Fast charging (67W)
Sleek design
Good value for money

Camera performance can be inconsistent
Lower peak brightness compared to Poco F4
Software experience can be slightly bloated

Xiaomi Poco F4

Bright and vibrant AMOLED display
Reliable Snapdragon 870 chipset
Excellent battery life
Fast charging (67W)

Design can be polarizing
Camera not as consistent as some competitors
Software experience can be slightly bloated

Display Comparison

The Poco F4 boasts a significant advantage in display quality. Its measured peak brightness of 1003 nits is considerably higher than the Redmi K50, making it much easier to see outdoors. While both have excellent contrast ratios (the Poco F4's is nominally infinite), the F4's brightness is a key differentiator. Both feature AMOLED panels with smooth 120Hz refresh rates.

Camera Comparison

Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F4 generally produces more consistent and pleasing results. The Redmi K50's camera can sometimes struggle with color accuracy and dynamic range. Both phones offer decent video recording capabilities, but neither is a class leader.

Performance

The Redmi K50's Dimensity 8100 is a powerful chipset, offering excellent performance in most scenarios. However, the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 remains a formidable contender. While the Dimensity 8100 might show a slight edge in some synthetic benchmarks, the 870's efficiency and proven track record make it a reliable choice for sustained performance. Both handle everyday tasks and gaming with ease.

Battery Life

Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings around 101 hours. The Poco F4 charges slightly faster, completing a full charge in 38 minutes compared to the Redmi K50's 30 minutes (80% charge). However, the difference is relatively minor.

Buying Guide

The Xiaomi Redmi K50 is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming and demanding tasks, and who appreciate a slightly more understated design. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is perfect for those who value a vibrant, high-brightness display, a proven and reliable chipset, and a slightly more aggressive aesthetic.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone is better for gaming?

Both are excellent for gaming. The Redmi K50's Dimensity 8100 offers slightly more raw power, but the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870 is also very capable and known for its efficiency.

❓ Is the Poco F4 worth the extra money?

It depends on your priorities. If you value a brighter display and a more consistent camera experience, the Poco F4 is worth the slight premium. If you're primarily focused on raw processing power and are on a tighter budget, the Redmi K50 is a strong contender.