Xiaomi Redmi K50 vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A73, and the 67W charging is substantially faster. However, Samsung’s software and brand recognition may appeal to some.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 | Samsung Galaxy A73 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, April 22 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.7 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm (6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Gray, Mint, White |
| Models | 22041211AC | SM-A736B, SM-A736B/DS |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.14 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.28 W/kg (head) 1.42 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- More powerful processor (Dimensity 8100)
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be polarizing
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
- Samsung’s One UI offers a polished software experience
- Strong brand recognition and ecosystem
- Potentially more consistent camera results
- Slower charging (25W)
- Less powerful processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- May exhibit more throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature AMOLED displays (based on market segment), the specifics aren't provided. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The Redmi K50’s chipset will likely drive a higher refresh rate display more smoothly. Samsung typically excels in color accuracy and outdoor visibility, but without nit brightness data, it’s difficult to definitively state which phone offers a superior viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, given both phones target a similar price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the chipset’s image signal processor (ISP) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 8100’s ISP is more advanced, potentially leading to better dynamic range and noise reduction in the Redmi K50’s photos. Samsung’s image processing tends to be more saturated and vibrant, which some users prefer. The absence of OIS information for either phone makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We can assume both phones will have a primary camera, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens, but the quality will heavily depend on the sensor size and aperture.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) in the Redmi K50 is the clear performance leader. Its octa-core configuration, with four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, significantly outpaces the Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) in the Galaxy A73, which has a single Cortex-A78 core at 2.4 GHz and three additional A78 cores. The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8100 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, meaning sustained performance will be higher during prolonged gaming sessions. The Galaxy A73’s Snapdragon 778G is still a capable chip, but it’s geared towards efficient everyday tasks rather than intensive workloads. The Redmi K50 will show a noticeable advantage in graphically demanding games and video rendering.
Battery Life
The Redmi K50’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reportedly reach 80% charge in just 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Galaxy A73’s 25W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed mitigates any potential difference in mAh. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 778G in the A73 is more efficient, but the Dimensity 8100’s performance advantage likely offsets this. Users who frequently top up their phones will greatly appreciate the Redmi K50’s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K50 if you need a phone that excels in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if you value incredibly fast charging speeds. You’ll benefit from a more powerful processor and a quicker top-up. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a well-established brand ecosystem, and a potentially more consistent camera experience, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.