Xiaomi Redmi K50 vs Realme GT Neo 3T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 8100 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift, particularly in sustained workloads, and its 67W charging is a solid all-rounder. While the GT Neo 3T boasts 80W charging, the K50’s superior processing power provides a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 30 min | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | 22041211AC | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50
- More powerful Dimensity 8100 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3 charging standards
- Display specifications are currently unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Faster 80W wired charging
- High peak display brightness (803 nits)
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Older 7nm chipset
- Less efficient than the Dimensity 8100
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, a respectable figure ensuring good visibility outdoors. However, the Redmi K50’s display specifications are currently unavailable, making a direct brightness comparison difficult. Given Xiaomi’s typical display quality, it’s reasonable to expect a comparable, if not superior, panel. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, a common marketing term. Without detailed color accuracy data for the K50, it’s hard to assess which offers a more color-accurate experience, but the GT Neo 3T’s brightness gives it a slight edge in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details in the provided data. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s likely both devices employ similar mid-range camera setups, focusing on versatility rather than exceptional image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact the overall photography experience. Real-world image samples would be crucial to determine which phone delivers better results.
Performance
This is where the K50 truly shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm) utilizes a more modern architecture than the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The K50’s CPU configuration – 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a higher peak clock speed and benefits from the efficiency gains of the 5nm process. The Snapdragon 870’s octa-core setup (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) is still capable, but the Dimensity 8100 offers a significant advantage in multi-core performance and sustained workloads. This translates to smoother gaming, faster video rendering, and a more responsive overall experience for K50 users.
Battery Life
Both the Redmi K50 and Realme GT Neo 3T share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The GT Neo 3T boasts 80W wired charging, while the K50 offers 67W. While 80W is faster, the K50 also supports PD3.0 and QC3 standards, offering broader compatibility. The K50 can reach 80% charge in 30 minutes, while the GT Neo 3T’s 0-100% time is not specified. The efficiency of the Dimensity 8100 may partially offset the charging speed difference, leading to comparable overall usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K50 if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value long-term performance. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds and are primarily focused on everyday tasks and casual gaming, and are comfortable with a slightly older chipset.