OnePlus 10T vs Xiaomi Redmi K50: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing ultimate charging speed and peak performance, the OnePlus 10T is the clear winner. However, the Xiaomi Redmi K50 provides a more efficient and well-rounded experience, offering excellent performance at a potentially lower cost, making it the better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 | OnePlus 10T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 38, 39, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (4CA), Cat20 2000/200 Mbps, 5GHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA), Cat16 1000/150 Mbps, 5G - India |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, August 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, August 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 75.4 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 2.97 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | Fluid AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 80% in 30 min | 150W wired (125W for 110V sockets) |
| Type | Li-Po 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Moonstone Black, Jade Green |
| Models | 22041211AC | CPH2415, CPH2413, CPH2417, CPH2419 |
| Price | About 480 EUR | € 377.26 / $ 289.88 / £ 330.00 / ₹ 34,198 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.7 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1016958 (v9) GeekBench: 3907 (v5.1) GFXBench: 103fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50
- Faster CPU for demanding tasks
- Incredibly fast 150W charging
- Potentially better image processing with Snapdragon ISP
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 prone to thermal throttling
- Potentially lower battery life due to chipset power draw
- Higher price point likely
OnePlus 10T
- More thermally efficient Dimensity 8100
- Competitive price point
- Balanced performance and battery life
- Slower charging speed compared to OnePlus 10T
- Potentially less powerful CPU for extreme tasks
- Camera performance may be less refined
Display Comparison
The OnePlus 10T boasts a measured peak brightness of 819 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Redmi K50’s display specifications aren’t provided, OnePlus’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. Both displays feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The lack of LTPO technology in either phone suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life compared to adaptive refresh rate displays. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, making a direct comparison difficult, but OnePlus generally focuses on color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering minimal insight. The absence of detailed sensor information necessitates a cautious approach. The OnePlus 10T likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. Without knowing sensor sizes or lens apertures, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance. The Redmi K50’s camera performance will depend heavily on its sensor and software optimization. It's reasonable to assume both phones will offer competent camera systems, but neither appears to be a standout in this category.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the OnePlus 10T utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) while the Redmi K50 features the Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core, clocked at 3.19 GHz, provides a performance edge in single-core tasks. However, the Dimensity 8100’s 5nm process offers superior thermal efficiency. The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate more heat under sustained load, potentially leading to throttling. The Redmi K50’s CPU configuration (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is well-suited for multitasking and gaming. RAM specifications are not provided, but both phones likely utilize LPDDR5 or LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
Both the OnePlus 10T and Redmi K50 achieve an endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified). However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The OnePlus 10T’s 150W wired charging (125W for 110V sockets) is a game-changer, potentially achieving a full charge in under 20 minutes. The Redmi K50’s 67W charging, while still fast, pales in comparison. The 150W charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The Dimensity 8100’s efficiency may partially offset the slower charging speed, providing comparable daily usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K50 if you need a phone that balances performance, efficiency, and price. It’s ideal for everyday users, content consumers, and casual gamers who want a reliable and long-lasting device. Buy the OnePlus 10T if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging available and demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks like heavy gaming or video editing, and are willing to accept potentially shorter battery life due to the more power-hungry chipset.