Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Ultra takes the crown for charging speed and potentially camera versatility with its higher resolution main sensor. However, the Poco F5 Pro shines with its brighter display and potentially better software experience, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing visual fidelity and a streamlined UI. It's a close call!
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Mercedes AMG | Black, White |
| Models | 22081212C | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 430 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Potentially higher resolution main camera sensor
- Slightly higher CPU clock speed (marginal benefit)
- Generally robust build quality
- Display not as bright as Poco F5 Pro
- Software experience can be cluttered (MIUI)
- Potentially larger and heavier
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Brighter, more vibrant display (1059 nits)
- Excellent battery life (99h endurance rating)
- Clean and streamlined MIUI experience
- Potentially more compact design
- Slower charging speed (67W wired)
- Potentially lower resolution main camera sensor
- Wireless charging is slower than wired
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, measured at 1059 nits peak brightness, offering a more vibrant and visible experience, especially outdoors. While the Redmi K50 Ultra's display is good, it doesn't reach the same level of brightness. The Poco F5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests excellent blacks and image depth, though this is a nominal value.
Camera Comparison
While both are marketed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Redmi K50 Ultra is expected to have a higher resolution main sensor (likely 200MP vs. the Poco F5 Pro's likely 50MP), potentially offering more detail and flexibility in image processing. The Poco F5 Pro's camera system is likely well-tuned for consistent results and ease of use. Detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing.
Performance
Both phones share the same Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. However, slight differences in CPU clock speeds (Redmi K50 Ultra has a slightly higher Cortex-X2 clock) *might* translate to marginally better performance in demanding tasks, but in real-world usage, the difference will likely be negligible. Both handle gaming and multitasking with ease.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Redmi K50 Ultra, while having a slightly smaller battery capacity, compensates with its blazing-fast 120W charging, allowing it to top up from 0% to 100% in just 19 minutes. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to charge their phones.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra is ideal for power users and those who prioritize incredibly fast charging and potentially a more versatile camera system. The Poco F5 Pro is a great choice for users who value a vibrant, bright display, a clean software experience, and a slightly more compact design.