Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra vs Poco F5: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Ultra boasts a significantly faster Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging. However, the Poco F5 offers a vibrant display, excellent battery life, and a more accessible price point. The K50 Ultra wins on raw power, while the F5 excels in value and daily usability.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, August 11 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, August 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 75.9 x 8.6 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202 g (7.13 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.19 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.6, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Mercedes AMG | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | 22081212C | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 430 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra
- Flagship Performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Blazing-Fast 120W Charging
- Potentially Higher Resolution Camera
- Premium Build Quality (likely)
- Higher Price
- Battery Life Not as Impressive as Poco F5
- May lack some software optimizations
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent Battery Life
- Vibrant and Bright Display
- More Affordable Price
- Good Overall Value
- Mid-Range Performance (Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2)
- Slower Charging (67W)
- Camera Performance Less Defined
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the display crown with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits and an infinite contrast ratio, promising vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Redmi K50 Ultra's display is good, but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Both use AMOLED panels, so expect rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but details are scarce. The Redmi K50 Ultra is expected to have a higher resolution main sensor, potentially leading to more detailed photos. The Poco F5's camera is likely optimized for consistent performance and ease of use. Real-world testing is needed to determine a clear winner.
Performance
Here, the Redmi K50 Ultra leaves no doubt. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset, significantly outperforming the Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2. Expect smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better multitasking on the K50 Ultra. The F5 is still capable, but not in the same league.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours. Its active use score of 11:52h is also excellent. The Redmi K50 Ultra, while having a decent battery, doesn't match the F5's longevity. However, the K50 Ultra's 120W charging more than compensates, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Ultra is ideal for gamers, power users, and those who prioritize performance above all else. The Poco F5 is a great choice for budget-conscious buyers who want a well-rounded phone with a fantastic display and long-lasting battery.