Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro vs Redmi K60E: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Pro boasts a significantly faster chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging. However, the K60E offers a more refined overall experience with potentially better efficiency and a slightly improved display. For raw power, the K50 Pro wins, but the K60E provides a more balanced package.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K60E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, December 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 19 min | 67W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Black, White, Green |
| Models | 22021211RC, 22011211C | 22122RK93C |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- More powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Excellent gaming performance
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Potentially less efficient than K60E
- Camera might not be as refined as K60E
- Design may be less premium
Xiaomi Redmi K60E
- Potentially better display color accuracy and brightness
- More efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Likely improved camera image processing
- Slightly more refined overall experience
- Slower 67W charging
- Less powerful chipset than K50 Pro
- Gaming performance not as high as K50 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The K60E is rumored to have slightly better color accuracy and brightness, potentially making it a better choice for outdoor use and content creation. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the K60E is expected to have a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance. Both likely feature a 50MP main sensor, but the K60E may have a more advanced image signal processor (ISP). Details on specific lens configurations are needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Dimensity 9000 in the K50 Pro is undeniably more powerful than the Dimensity 8200 in the K60E. Expect noticeably faster gaming performance and quicker app loading times on the K50 Pro. The K60E, however, is still a very capable performer for everyday tasks and most games.
Battery Life
The K50 Pro's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The K60E's 67W charging is still respectable, but significantly slower. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh) on both devices, but the K60E's more efficient chipset might result in slightly better real-world battery life.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro is ideal for gamers and power users who prioritize performance above all else and appreciate incredibly fast charging. The Redmi K60E is a great choice for users seeking a well-rounded experience with a good balance of performance, efficiency, and a smoother display, especially if fast charging isn't a top priority.