Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro vs Poco F4: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Pro boasts a significantly faster chipset and blazing-fast 120W charging. However, the Poco F4 shines with its exceptional display brightness and impressive battery endurance. Ultimately, the K50 Pro prioritizes raw power, while the F4 offers a more balanced and refined experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro | Xiaomi Poco F4 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 22 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14.2 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide) 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 19 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Moonlight Silver, Night Black, Nebula Green |
| Models | 22021211RC, 22011211C | 22021211RG, 22021211RI |
| Price | About 410 EUR | ₹ 16,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 101h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 590961 (v8), 698586 (v9) GeekBench: 3190 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Superior performance with Dimensity 9000
- Good AMOLED display
- Excellent value for performance
- Camera performance could be better
- Battery life not as impressive as Poco F4
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Xiaomi Poco F4
- Exceptional display brightness (1003 nits)
- Long battery life (101h endurance rating)
- Well-rounded performance with Snapdragon 870
- Competitive price
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Performance not as high as Redmi K50 Pro
- Design is somewhat generic
Display Comparison
The Poco F4 takes the display crown. While the K50 Pro has a good AMOLED display, the F4's measured 1003 nits peak brightness is significantly higher, making it much easier to see outdoors. The F4 also boasts an impressive contrast ratio, though both offer smooth 120Hz refresh rates. The K50 Pro's display is likely to be slightly more color accurate out of the box.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Poco F4 might have a slight edge in overall image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The K50 Pro's camera is generally considered to be good, but not exceptional. Both offer standard photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera comparisons would require more in-depth testing.
Performance
The Redmi K50 Pro's Dimensity 9000 chipset is the clear winner here. It offers substantially more processing power than the Poco F4's Snapdragon 870, resulting in smoother gaming, faster app loading, and better multitasking. While the 870 is still a capable chip, the 9000 provides a noticeable performance boost.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 demonstrates superior battery endurance, boasting an impressive 101h endurance rating. While the K50 Pro's 120W charging is incredibly fast (fully charging in just 19 minutes), the F4's larger battery and efficient processor allow it to last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Pro is ideal for gamers and power users who demand the absolute best performance and rapid charging. The Xiaomi Poco F4 is a great choice for those prioritizing a vibrant display, long battery life, and a more well-rounded overall experience, especially for everyday use and media consumption.