Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming vs Redmi K60: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K60 emerges as the overall winner thanks to its more efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, improved battery life, and added wireless charging. While the K50 Gaming boasts faster wired charging, the K60's refinements make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming | Xiaomi Redmi K60 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2023, January 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | - |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 199 g or 204 g (7.02 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | - | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+ 30W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG | Black, White, Blue, Green |
| Models | 21121210C | - |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 350 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Excellent gaming performance
- Aggressive gaming design
- Competitive price
- Less efficient chipset
- Shorter battery life
- No wireless charging
- Camera not as refined as K60
Xiaomi Redmi K60
- More efficient Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Better battery life
- Wireless charging support
- Improved camera system
- Refined design
- Slower wired charging (67W)
- Slightly higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The K60 generally has slightly better color accuracy and brightness, leading to a marginally superior viewing experience. The K50 Gaming might have a slightly higher touch sampling rate, potentially beneficial for competitive gaming.
Camera Comparison
The K60 typically features a more versatile camera system, often including a higher resolution main sensor and improved image processing. Expect better low-light performance and more detailed photos from the K60. The K50 Gaming's camera is still capable, but it doesn't match the K60's overall quality.
Performance
The K60's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a significant upgrade over the K50 Gaming's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The 8+ Gen 1 offers improved efficiency and sustained performance, meaning less throttling during extended gaming sessions and better overall responsiveness. While both phones are powerful, the K60 holds a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The K60's improved efficiency, combined with a potentially larger battery capacity (often around 5000mAh), results in significantly better battery life than the K50 Gaming. The K60 also supports 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the K50 Gaming. The K50 Gaming's 120W wired charging is still incredibly fast, but the K60's overall battery performance is superior.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming is ideal for hardcore gamers seeking maximum performance and blazing-fast wired charging. The Redmi K60 is better suited for users who prioritize efficiency, all-around performance, and the convenience of wireless charging, alongside a more refined overall experience.