Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming vs Redmi K40 Gaming: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Gaming is the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, blazing-fast 120W charging, and improved overall performance. However, the K40 Gaming remains a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers seeking a still-capable device.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2021, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | Physical pop-up gaming triggers IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow |
| Models | 21121210C | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC |
| Price | About 460 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Significantly faster performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 1)
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Improved camera system
- Excellent display
- Gaming-focused features (shoulder triggers)
- Potentially higher price
- Can run hotter under sustained load
- May have slightly shorter software support lifespan compared to K40 Gaming
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- More affordable
- Still offers a smooth gaming experience
- Good battery life
- Excellent display
- Reliable performance for most games
- Slower performance compared to K50 Gaming
- Slower 67W charging
- Less advanced camera system
- May struggle with the most demanding games at max settings
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a vibrant 144Hz AMOLED display, offering smooth visuals and immersive gaming. The K50 Gaming might have slightly improved color accuracy and brightness, but the difference is minimal. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
The K50 Gaming generally offers improved camera performance, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones have capable camera systems, the K50 Gaming's image processing and sensor technology are more advanced. Expect better detail and dynamic range.
Performance
The K50 Gaming's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a substantial upgrade over the K40 Gaming's Dimensity 1200. Expect significantly faster load times, smoother gameplay, and better multitasking on the K50 Gaming. The K40 Gaming still performs well, but struggles with the most demanding titles at maximum settings.
Battery Life
The K50 Gaming's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The K40 Gaming's 67W charging is still respectable, but takes considerably longer to fully charge. Battery capacity is similar, but the K50 Gaming's efficiency helps offset the slightly faster drain due to the more powerful processor.
Buying Guide
The Redmi K50 Gaming is ideal for hardcore gamers who demand the absolute best performance and fastest charging. The Redmi K40 Gaming is a great choice for gamers on a tighter budget who still want a smooth gaming experience and a solid feature set.