Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming vs Poco F5 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 Pro edges out the Redmi K50 Gaming thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset, brighter display, and wireless charging. While the K50 Gaming offers blazing-fast 120W wired charging, the F5 Pro's overall package provides a more refined and versatile experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG | Black, White |
| Models | 21121210C | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 460 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Excellent gaming performance
- Aggressive design
- Good cooling system
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (less efficient than 8+ Gen 1)
- Potentially less refined camera
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (superior performance & efficiency)
- Brighter display
- Wireless charging
- Excellent battery life
- More refined design
- Slower charging compared to K50 Gaming
- Camera may not be flagship-level
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its measured 1059 nits peak brightness, making it far more visible in direct sunlight. While both phones likely use AMOLED panels, the F5 Pro's contrast ratio (nominally infinite) suggests excellent black levels and vibrant colors. The K50 Gaming's display is still good, but not as impressive.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited in the provided specs. However, based on general knowledge, the Poco F5 Pro is expected to have a slightly more refined camera system, potentially with better image processing and low-light performance. Both phones likely offer capable photo and video capabilities, but the F5 Pro likely has a slight edge.
Performance
While both phones utilize Snapdragon chipsets, the Poco F5 Pro's Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is a noticeable upgrade over the K50 Gaming's Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. The 8+ Gen 1 offers improved efficiency and slightly better sustained performance, especially during extended gaming sessions. Both phones have the same CPU configuration, but the 8+ Gen 1's GPU is superior.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The K50 Gaming's 120W charging is a standout feature, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. However, battery capacity is likely similar between the two devices, meaning the F5 Pro's efficiency is the key factor in its longevity.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming is ideal for hardcore gamers prioritizing raw performance and ultra-fast charging. The Poco F5 Pro is a better choice for users seeking a well-rounded experience with a vibrant display, efficient performance, and the convenience of wireless charging, all at a competitive price.