Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming vs Poco F4 GT: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT edges out the Redmi K50 Gaming due to its slightly better battery life and potentially more aggressive pricing. Both offer blazing-fast performance thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, but the Poco's endurance gives it a slight advantage for all-day use. Ultimately, the choice depends on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 16 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February 18 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Virtual proximity sensing | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | 21121210C | 21121210G |
| Price | About 460 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Potentially better cooling system for sustained gaming
- Refined design (subjective)
- Potentially better display calibration
- Potentially shorter battery life
- May be slightly more expensive
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Excellent battery life (81h endurance rating)
- Aggressive pricing (typically)
- Responsive display
- Gamer-centric design
- Design may not appeal to everyone
- Potential for slight throttling under extreme load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, likely with a 120Hz refresh rate. While both claim 'infinite' contrast ratio (a marketing term), expect vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Redmi K50 Gaming might have slightly better color calibration or brightness, but real-world differences will be minimal. The Poco F4 GT's display is known for its responsiveness, making it a good choice for gaming.
Camera Comparison
The Poco F4 GT is expected to have a versatile camera setup, likely including a main sensor, ultrawide, and macro lens. The Redmi K50 Gaming's camera system is likely similar, but Xiaomi often focuses on software optimization. Image quality should be comparable, with both phones capable of capturing detailed photos and videos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance will depend on the specific sensors used.
Performance
Performance is virtually identical. Both are powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, paired with ample RAM and storage. Expect smooth multitasking, effortless gaming, and snappy app launches. The Redmi K50 Gaming's cooling system might provide a slight edge in sustained performance during extended gaming sessions, preventing throttling.
Battery Life
The Poco F4 GT boasts an impressive endurance rating of 81 hours, suggesting superior battery life compared to the Redmi K50 Gaming. While both support 120W fast charging (reaching 100% in 17 minutes), the Poco's larger battery capacity will allow for longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
The Redmi K50 Gaming is ideal for hardcore gamers who prioritize cooling solutions and potentially a more refined design. The Poco F4 GT is a great choice for those seeking a powerful phone with excellent battery life and a focus on value, especially if you appreciate a more gamer-centric aesthetic.