Xiaomi Redmi K40S vs Redmi K40 Pro+: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K40 Pro+ boasts the superior Snapdragon 888 chipset and a faster charging speed, but the K40S offers excellent performance at a lower price point. For those prioritizing raw power and charging, the Pro+ wins; for budget-conscious buyers, the K40S is a fantastic choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40S | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2021, February 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Black, White, Aurora |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 470 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K40S
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 67W charging
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Good camera system
- Slightly older chipset compared to Pro+
- 33W charging on Pro+ is faster
- May lack some of the Pro+'s premium features
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Flagship Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Potentially better camera performance
- Slightly better display (potentially)
- Premium build quality (potentially)
- Slower 33W charging
- Higher price point
- Snapdragon 888 can run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The K40 Pro+ *may* have slightly better color accuracy and brightness due to potential panel variations, but the difference is likely minimal for most users. Resolution is generally FHD+ on both.
Camera Comparison
The K40 Pro+ typically features a higher resolution primary sensor (108MP vs. 48MP on the K40S) and potentially improved image processing. Both phones offer a versatile camera system with ultrawide and macro lenses. Low-light performance and video recording quality are generally good on both, but the Pro+ *could* have a slight advantage.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the K40 Pro+ holds a performance edge over the Snapdragon 870 in the K40S. While the 870 is still incredibly capable, the 888 offers better multi-core performance and handles demanding tasks with slightly more ease. Expect slightly better gaming performance on the Pro+.
Battery Life
The K40S shines with its 67W fast charging, allowing for a full charge in around 38 minutes. The K40 Pro+'s 33W charging is slower, taking approximately 52 minutes to reach 100%. Battery capacity is similar (around 4500mAh) on both devices, so charging speed is the key differentiator.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40S is ideal for users seeking a high-performance phone without breaking the bank. It's perfect for gaming, multitasking, and everyday use. The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ is best for power users who demand the absolute best performance, faster charging, and potentially a slightly better camera experience (depending on software optimization).