Xiaomi Redmi K40S vs Poco F3: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K40S edges out the Poco F3 thanks to its significantly faster charging and potentially improved camera capabilities (though both are good). However, the Poco F3 boasts exceptional battery life and a slightly more aggressive price point, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40S | Xiaomi Poco F3 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 17 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 17 | Available. Released 2021, March 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 13 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/120fps | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Blue, Green | Arctic White, Night Black, Deep Ocean Blue, Moonlight Silver |
| Models | - | M2012K11AG |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 162.15 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 631850 (v8), 697216 (v9) GeekBench: 3206 (v5.1) GFXBench: 48fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40S
- Faster 67W Charging
- Potentially Improved Camera
- Slightly Better Color Accuracy (Display)
- Premium Build Quality (likely)
- Higher Price
- Shorter Battery Life Compared to Poco F3
- Macro Lens Quality (typical for this price range)
Xiaomi Poco F3
- Exceptional Battery Life
- Aggressive Price Point
- Smooth 120Hz AMOLED Display
- Excellent Performance
- Slower 33W Charging
- Potentially Slightly Inferior Camera
- Build Quality (may feel less premium)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a vibrant 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering a fluid and immersive viewing experience. The Poco F3 advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, which is a nominal term, but both displays are excellent. The K40S might have slightly better color accuracy, but it's a marginal difference.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K40S is expected to have a slightly improved camera system, potentially with a better main sensor and image processing. While the Poco F3's camera is capable, the K40S likely offers a more refined photographic experience. Both feature a similar setup with a main lens, ultrawide, and macro lens.
Performance
Powered by the Snapdragon 870, both phones deliver flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, effortless gaming, and snappy app launches. There's virtually no difference in day-to-day performance between the two.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 114 hours is exceptional, significantly outperforming the Redmi K40S. While the K40S offers incredibly fast 67W charging, the Poco F3's larger battery capacity provides longer usage between charges.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40S is ideal for users who prioritize fast charging, potentially better camera performance, and don't mind spending a bit more. The Xiaomi Poco F3 is perfect for those seeking incredible battery life, a smooth display, and a fantastic value proposition, especially if charging speed isn't a top concern.