Redmi K40 Pro+ vs Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and faster charging, the Redmi K40 Pro+ is the clear winner. However, the Pixel 6a’s superior image processing and guaranteed software updates make it the better choice for photography enthusiasts and those seeking a long-term, hassle-free experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro) | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 470 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Faster charging with 33W support
- Potentially stronger GPU performance for gaming
- Snapdragon 888 offers raw processing power
- Battery capacity is unknown
- Software update support may be limited compared to Pixel
Google Pixel 6a
- Excellent camera performance with Google’s image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Slower 18W charging
- Tensor chip may not match Snapdragon 888 in raw gaming performance
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 876 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the K40 Pro+. While the K40 Pro+’s panel specifications are missing, the Pixel 6a’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a superior OLED experience. The Pixel 6a’s display is likely to be more visible outdoors under direct sunlight. The lack of refresh rate information for the K40 Pro+ suggests it may not offer the smoother scrolling experience found on some competing devices.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s strength lies in its computational photography capabilities, leveraging the Tensor chip’s AI prowess. While sensor sizes and apertures are not specified for either device, Google’s image processing algorithms consistently deliver excellent dynamic range and detail. The K40 Pro+’s camera system is unknown, but Xiaomi often focuses on high megapixel counts, which doesn’t always translate to better image quality. The Pixel 6a’s focus on software optimization likely provides a more consistent and reliable camera experience.
Performance
Both phones utilize 5nm fabrication processes, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Redmi K40 Pro+ features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, with a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.84 GHz. The Pixel 6a employs Google’s Tensor chip, featuring a dual Cortex-X1 setup at 2.80 GHz. While clock speeds are similar, the Tensor chip’s architecture emphasizes AI and machine learning tasks, potentially giving it an edge in areas like image processing and voice recognition. The K40 Pro+’s Adreno 660 GPU likely provides a stronger raw graphics performance, benefiting gamers. However, the Tensor’s thermal design may allow for more sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 94 hours, indicating comparable battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified for the K40 Pro+). However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Redmi K40 Pro+ supports 33W wired charging, reaching 100% in 52 minutes, while the Pixel 6a is limited to 18W, utilizing PD3.0. This means the K40 Pro+ offers significantly faster top-ups, a crucial advantage for users who frequently need to recharge quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ if you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications, and value faster charging speeds. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prefer a clean Android experience, exceptional camera performance, and guaranteed software updates, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing power.