Redmi K40 Pro vs. Google Pixel 6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of performance and affordability, the Redmi K40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 888 delivers comparable processing power to the Tensor, coupled with faster charging, all at a significantly lower price point. However, the Pixel 6 Pro’s superior camera and software experience make it a compelling choice for photography enthusiasts and Google ecosystem devotees.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro | Google Pixel 6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GLUOG, G8VOU |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G8VOU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GLUOG | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, October 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2021, October 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 163.9 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 104mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 4x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 11.1 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh | Li-Ion 5003 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Cloudy White, Sorta Sunny, Stormy Black |
| Models | M2012K11C | GLUOG, G8VOU, GF5KQ |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 199.99 / $ 204.99 / £ 275.00 / ₹ 29,699 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 84h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 585485 (v8), 719815 (v9) GeekBench: 2831 (v5.1) GFXBench: 39 fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro
- Faster 33W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Powerful Snapdragon 888 processor
- Camera likely lacks Pixel 6 Pro’s computational photography prowess
- Software updates may be less frequent
Google Pixel 6 Pro
- Superior camera system with AI features
- Clean and consistently updated Android experience
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Slower 23W wired charging
- Higher price tag
- Tensor chip’s raw performance may trail Snapdragon 888 in some tasks
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 846 nits, compared to an unspecified peak brightness for the K40 Pro. While the K40 Pro’s display specs aren’t provided, the Pixel 6 Pro’s infinite contrast ratio suggests a superior viewing experience, particularly with HDR content. The Pixel 6 Pro’s larger display size is also a factor for media consumption, though the K40 Pro likely offers a more power-efficient panel due to its lower peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6 Pro’s camera system is a key differentiator. While specific sensor details are missing for the K40 Pro, the Pixel 6 Pro’s image processing, powered by the Tensor chip, excels in dynamic range and computational photography. The Tensor’s dedicated image processing unit allows for features like Magic Eraser and Face Unblur, unavailable on the K40 Pro. The Pixel 6 Pro’s OIS is crucial for stable video recording and low-light photography, while the K40 Pro’s camera performance relies more heavily on the Snapdragon 888’s ISP.
Performance
Both devices utilize a 5nm fabrication process, but the chipsets differ significantly. The Redmi K40 Pro’s Snapdragon 888 features a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, while the Pixel 6 Pro’s Google Tensor uses a similar Cortex-X1 core at 2.80 GHz. However, the Tensor’s architecture emphasizes AI and machine learning tasks, potentially offering advantages in areas like image processing and voice recognition. The K40 Pro’s Adreno 660 GPU provides strong graphics performance, but the Tensor’s GPU is less well-defined in terms of raw power. Both phones feature octa-core CPUs with similar Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, suggesting comparable power efficiency during less demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 84 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing battery capacities (not specified for the K40 Pro). However, the charging speeds diverge significantly. The Redmi K40 Pro supports 33W wired charging, reaching 100% in 52 minutes, while the Pixel 6 Pro offers slower 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes) and the addition of 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging. This makes the K40 Pro more convenient for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro if you need uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and value fast charging and a lower price tag. You’ll benefit from the Snapdragon 888’s power and the 33W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 6 Pro if you prefer a best-in-class camera experience, a clean and consistently updated Android interface, and are willing to pay a premium for Google’s AI-powered features and long-term software support.