Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ vs Redmi K40 Gaming: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K40 Pro+ boasts a superior Snapdragon 888 chipset and a more versatile camera system, making it the overall winner. However, the K40 Gaming’s faster charging and gaming-focused features make it a compelling choice for mobile gamers on a budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2021, April 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow |
| Models | - | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Excellent Camera System (108MP)
- Slightly Better Display Calibration
- Premium Build Quality
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Can get warm under heavy load
- Slightly Higher Price
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Gaming-Focused Features (Enhanced Cooling)
- Competitive Price
- Good Performance (Dimensity 1200)
- Less Versatile Camera
- Slightly Lower Performance than Pro+
- Potentially Less Premium Build
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a vibrant 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and immersive visuals. The Pro+ might have slightly better color accuracy due to its potentially higher calibration, but the difference is minimal for most users. Both support HDR10+.
Camera Comparison
The K40 Pro+ has a significant advantage in the camera department. It features a 108MP main sensor, offering greater detail and flexibility. The K40 Gaming has a 64MP main sensor, which is still capable, but lacks the Pro+'s superior image processing and zoom capabilities. Both offer ultrawide and macro lenses.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the K40 Pro+ generally outperforms the Dimensity 1200 in the K40 Gaming in sustained workloads and demanding tasks. While the Dimensity 1200 is no slouch, the 888's raw power gives the Pro+ an edge. The K40 Gaming's enhanced cooling system helps maintain performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The K40 Gaming takes the lead here with its 67W fast charging, allowing for quicker top-ups compared to the K40 Pro+'s 33W charging. Both phones have a similar battery capacity (around 4500mAh), so battery life is comparable under normal usage.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ is ideal for users who prioritize overall performance, a great camera, and a balanced feature set. The Redmi K40 Gaming is perfect for mobile gamers who want a dedicated gaming experience with faster charging and enhanced cooling, even if it means slightly compromising on camera quality.