Xiaomi consistently delivers impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Redmi K40 Pro+ and Poco F3 GT are two prime examples, offering flagship-level features without the flagship price tag. But which one deserves your money? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F3 GT takes the crown for its significantly faster charging and slightly better value. However, the Redmi K40 Pro+ boasts a superior Snapdragon 888 chipset and potentially better camera performance, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing raw power and image quality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | - | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Superior Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Potentially better camera quality
- Excellent AMOLED display
- Premium build quality
- Slower charging speed
- Can get warm under heavy load
- Slightly higher price
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Blazing-fast 67W charging
- Competitive price
- Good performance for gaming
- Stylish design
- Camera not as impressive as K40 Pro+
- Dimensity 1200 may throttle under sustained load
- Build quality slightly less premium
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant AMOLED displays with 120Hz refresh rates, offering a smooth and immersive viewing experience. The Redmi K40 Pro+ might have slightly better color accuracy, but the difference is minimal. Resolution is generally comparable.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K40 Pro+ is expected to have a more versatile camera system, potentially with a higher resolution primary sensor and improved image processing. While the Poco F3 GT's camera is decent, the K40 Pro+ likely delivers superior image quality, especially in low light. Both offer 4K video recording.
Performance
The Redmi K40 Pro+’s Snapdragon 888 generally edges out the Dimensity 1200 in sustained performance and overall responsiveness, especially in demanding games. The Dimensity 1200 is still very capable, but the Snapdragon offers a noticeable advantage. Both handle everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT's 67W charging is a clear winner, significantly reducing charging times compared to the Redmi K40 Pro+'s 33W. Battery capacity is similar, so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the Poco F3 GT offers a faster top-up.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ is ideal for users who prioritize top-tier performance and a versatile camera system. The Poco F3 GT is a great choice for those who value incredibly fast charging and a more budget-friendly price point, especially gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Redmi K40 Pro+ generally offers slightly better sustained performance for gaming due to its Snapdragon 888 chipset, but the Poco F3 GT is still a very capable gaming phone, especially considering its price.
❓ Is the Redmi K40 Pro+ worth the extra money?
If camera quality and raw processing power are your priorities, then yes. The K40 Pro+ offers a more premium experience. However, if fast charging and value are more important, the Poco F3 GT is an excellent choice.
