Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ vs Mi 11i: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K40 Pro+ generally edges out the Mi 11i due to its potentially superior camera system (often featuring a higher resolution main sensor) and slightly more aggressive pricing. However, the Mi 11i boasts a brighter display and potentially better software support, making it a compelling alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ | Xiaomi Mi 11i |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, February 25 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 04 | Available. Released 2021, May 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) | 163.7 x 76.4 x 7.8 mm (6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| IP53, dust and splash resistant | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 900 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 20 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min (advertised) | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 52 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4520 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4520 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Aurora | Celestial Silver, Frosty White, Cosmic Black |
| Models | - | M2012K11G |
| Price | About 470 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.95 W/kg (head) 0.74 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.77 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.0 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 690021 (v8) GeekBench: 3641 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+
- Potentially superior camera system
- Excellent performance
- Competitive pricing
- Fast charging (33W)
- Design might be less premium
- Potential for throttling under heavy load
- Software support may be shorter than Mi series
Xiaomi Mi 11i
- Brighter display (939 nits)
- Potentially longer software support
- Sleek design
- Excellent battery life (96h endurance)
- Performance throttling possible
- Camera may not be as advanced as K40 Pro+
- Price may be slightly higher
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling and vibrant colors. However, the Mi 11i's measured peak brightness of 939 nits gives it a noticeable advantage in outdoor visibility. The Redmi K40 Pro+ likely has excellent color accuracy, but lacks the measured brightness data. Contrast ratio is likely excellent on both, with the Mi 11i claiming 'infinite' (nominal).
Camera Comparison
The Redmi K40 Pro+ is generally expected to have a more advanced camera system, often featuring a 108MP main sensor compared to the Mi 11i's likely 108MP or similar. Both offer excellent image quality in good lighting conditions, but the K40 Pro+ may offer better low-light performance and more detail. Video recording capabilities are likely comparable on both.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 888, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect snappy multitasking, smooth gaming, and effortless handling of demanding apps. Thermal management will be a key factor; both phones can experience throttling under sustained load, but the Redmi K40 Pro+ might have a slightly more robust cooling solution.
Battery Life
The Mi 11i boasts an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting superior battery optimization or a slightly larger battery capacity. The Redmi K40 Pro+ has a 33W charger, which is adequate but not class-leading. Both phones should comfortably last a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Pro+ is ideal for users prioritizing camera performance and value for money. The Mi 11i is a great choice for those who value a vibrant display, potentially longer software support, and a slightly more refined design.