Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming vs Redmi K50 Gaming: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K50 Gaming is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, a faster charging speed, and likely improved camera capabilities. However, the K40 Gaming remains a strong contender, especially for budget-conscious gamers seeking excellent value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming | Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue, AMG |
| Models | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC | 21121210C |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 460 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Excellent value for money
- Powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Smooth 144Hz display
- Fast 67W charging
- Older chipset compared to K50 Gaming
- Slower charging speed
- Potentially less advanced camera
Xiaomi Redmi K50 Gaming
- Blazing-fast Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset
- Incredibly fast 120W charging
- Likely improved camera performance
- Premium build quality
- Higher price point
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 can experience thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays, typically around 144Hz, offering smooth visuals. The K50 Gaming likely has slightly improved color accuracy and brightness due to newer panel technology, but the difference is subtle. Both offer excellent viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the K50 Gaming is expected to have a more advanced setup. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 typically pairs with better image signal processors (ISPs), leading to improved image quality, especially in low light. Expect better dynamic range and detail on the K50 Gaming. Both likely feature a primary 64MP sensor.
Performance
This is where the K50 Gaming truly shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200, offering significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. Expect smoother gameplay, quicker app loading times, and better multitasking on the K50 Gaming. The K40 Gaming is still capable, but the K50 Gaming is in a different league.
Battery Life
The K50 Gaming's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast charging times. The K40 Gaming's 67W charging is still respectable, but the K50 Gaming can charge from 0% to 100% in around 17 minutes, compared to 42 minutes for the K40 Gaming. Battery capacity is likely similar, around 4500-5000mAh.
Buying Guide
The Redmi K40 Gaming is ideal for gamers on a tighter budget who still want a powerful device for mobile gaming. The Redmi K50 Gaming is the better choice for those who demand the absolute best performance, fastest charging, and are willing to pay a premium.