Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming vs Redmi K40S: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K40S edges out the Gaming model thanks to its superior Snapdragon 870 chipset, offering noticeably better performance and efficiency. While the Gaming version boasts enhanced cooling, the K40S's overall package makes it the slightly better choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming | Xiaomi Redmi K40S |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 163.2 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers IP53, dust and splash resistant | Splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow | Black, Gray, Blue, Green |
| Models | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC | - |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Excellent cooling system for sustained gaming
- Dedicated gaming mode
- Fast 67W charging
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Competitive price
- Dimensity 1200 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 870
- Camera slightly inferior to K40S
- Design may be too 'gamer' for some
Xiaomi Redmi K40S
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset
- Slightly better camera performance
- Faster charging (marginally)
- More efficient processor
- Generally better value
- Cooling system not as robust as the Gaming model
- Design is more understated (some may prefer the Gaming's look)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.67-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a 240Hz touch sampling rate. The resolution is FHD+ (2400 x 1080) on both. While both offer vibrant colors and smooth visuals, the K40S might have slightly better color accuracy due to potential calibration differences. The Gaming model might have a slightly brighter display, but this is not consistently reported.
Camera Comparison
The K40S generally has a slightly better camera system. Both feature a 48MP main sensor, but the K40S often produces more detailed and vibrant images. The K40S also has a better ultrawide lens. Both phones offer decent selfie cameras, but the K40S's processing tends to be more refined. Video recording capabilities are comparable on both.
Performance
This is where the biggest difference lies. The Snapdragon 870 in the K40S is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Dimensity 1200 in the K40 Gaming. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games on the K40S. The K40 Gaming does have a dedicated gaming mode and improved cooling, which helps maintain performance during extended gaming sessions, but the Snapdragon 870 still holds the advantage.
Battery Life
Both phones have a 4500mAh battery and support 67W fast charging. The K40S charges slightly faster (38 minutes vs 42 minutes), likely due to the more efficient Snapdragon chipset. Battery life is comparable in real-world usage, lasting a full day for moderate users.
Buying Guide
The Redmi K40 Gaming is ideal for mobile gamers who prioritize sustained performance and cooling. If you're a casual user or gamer who values a more powerful and efficient chipset, the Redmi K40S is the better option. Consider your budget and gaming habits when making your decision.