Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming vs Poco F4 GT: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F4 GT takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 chipset, blazing-fast 120W charging, and generally more premium feel. While the Redmi K40 Gaming offers solid performance and a competitive price, the F4 GT's upgrades make it the superior choice for most.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming | Xiaomi Poco F4 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 27 | 2022, April 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 162.5 x 76.7 x 8.5 mm (6.40 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 210 g (7.41 oz) |
| Physical pop-up gaming triggers IP53, dust and splash resistant | Physical magnetic pop-up gaming triggers | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5065 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gray, Silver, Bruce Lee Yellow | Stealth Black, Knight Silver, Cyber Yellow |
| Models | M2012K10C, M2104K10AC | 21121210G |
| Price | About 260 EUR | € 227.11 / £ 339.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 81h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.4 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 952124 (v9) GeekBench: 3637 (v5.1) |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming
- Excellent value for money
- Smooth gaming performance
- Fast 67W charging
- Good display
- Dimensity 1200 chipset is less powerful than Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
- Slower charging compared to F4 GT
- Design can be polarizing
Xiaomi Poco F4 GT
- Top-tier Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 performance
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Premium design and build quality
- Excellent display
- More expensive than the Redmi K40 Gaming
- Potential for thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, likely with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but both should offer vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Poco F4 GT might have slightly better brightness due to its more premium positioning, but real-world differences will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar, with both phones offering capable main sensors and ultrawide lenses. The Poco F4 GT might have slightly better image processing due to Qualcomm's generally stronger ISP, but both should produce decent photos and videos in good lighting. Low-light performance will be comparable.
Performance
This is where the Poco F4 GT shines. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a substantial upgrade over the Dimensity 1200. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better performance in demanding games. The Dimensity 1200 is still capable, but the 8 Gen 1 offers a noticeable edge.
Battery Life
The Redmi K40 Gaming has a slightly larger battery capacity, but the Poco F4 GT's 120W charging is a game-changer. It can charge from 0% to 100% in around 17 minutes, while the K40 Gaming takes over 40 minutes. Both offer all-day battery life with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Xiaomi Redmi K40 Gaming is ideal for budget-conscious gamers who prioritize a smooth gaming experience and fast charging without breaking the bank. The Xiaomi Poco F4 GT is for those who demand top-tier performance, ultra-fast charging, and a more premium design, and are willing to pay a bit more.